All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mathieu souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:47:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398447604-21471-1-git-send-email-mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>

In this patch, unwindind is still not perfect from the 
mce_device_create() calls. I guess, from this point, on error we should 
call mce_device_remove on every created device. But I think this will 
make the code rather complex. And I am not too confident on this kind of 
modification as I don't know much about MCE.

Mathieu S.

Le 25/04/2014 19:40, Mathieu Souchaud a écrit :
> Check return code of every function called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 68317c8..b865285 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2437,33 +2437,49 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
>   	int err;
>   	int i = 0;
>   
> -	if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
> -		return -EIO;
> +	if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data)) {
> +		err = -EIO;
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>   
> -	zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>   
>   	mce_init_banks();
>   
>   	err = subsys_system_register(&mce_subsys, NULL);
>   	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_out_mem;
>   
>   	cpu_notifier_register_begin();
>   	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>   		err = mce_device_create(i);
>   		if (err) {
>   			cpu_notifier_register_done();
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_out_mem;
>   		}
>   	}
>   
>   	register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
> -	__register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> +	err = __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
>   	cpu_notifier_register_done();
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_out_mem;
>   
>   	/* register character device /dev/mcelog */
> -	misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> +	err = misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_out_mem;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_out_mem:
> +	free_cpumask_var(mce_device_initialized);
>   
> +err_out:
> +	pr_err("Unable to init device /dev/mcelog (rc: %d)\n", err);
>   	return err;
>   }
>   device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mathieu souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:47:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398447604-21471-1-git-send-email-mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>

In this patch, unwindind is still not perfect from the 
mce_device_create() calls. I guess, from this point, on error we should 
call mce_device_remove on every created device. But I think this will 
make the code rather complex. And I am not too confident on this kind of 
modification as I don't know much about MCE.

Mathieu S.

Le 25/04/2014 19:40, Mathieu Souchaud a écrit :
> Check return code of every function called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 68317c8..b865285 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2437,33 +2437,49 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
>   	int err;
>   	int i = 0;
>   
> -	if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
> -		return -EIO;
> +	if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data)) {
> +		err = -EIO;
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>   
> -	zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>   
>   	mce_init_banks();
>   
>   	err = subsys_system_register(&mce_subsys, NULL);
>   	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_out_mem;
>   
>   	cpu_notifier_register_begin();
>   	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>   		err = mce_device_create(i);
>   		if (err) {
>   			cpu_notifier_register_done();
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_out_mem;
>   		}
>   	}
>   
>   	register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
> -	__register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> +	err = __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
>   	cpu_notifier_register_done();
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_out_mem;
>   
>   	/* register character device /dev/mcelog */
> -	misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> +	err = misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_out_mem;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_out_mem:
> +	free_cpumask_var(mce_device_initialized);
>   
> +err_out:
> +	pr_err("Unable to init device /dev/mcelog (rc: %d)\n", err);
>   	return err;
>   }
>   device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device);


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-25 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-25 17:40 [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling Mathieu Souchaud
2014-04-25 17:40 ` Mathieu Souchaud
2014-04-25 17:47 ` mathieu souchaud [this message]
2014-04-25 17:47   ` mathieu souchaud
2014-04-28 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 19:36   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr \
    --to=mattieu.souchaud@free.fr \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.