From: mathieu souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:47:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398447604-21471-1-git-send-email-mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
In this patch, unwindind is still not perfect from the
mce_device_create() calls. I guess, from this point, on error we should
call mce_device_remove on every created device. But I think this will
make the code rather complex. And I am not too confident on this kind of
modification as I don't know much about MCE.
Mathieu S.
Le 25/04/2014 19:40, Mathieu Souchaud a écrit :
> Check return code of every function called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 68317c8..b865285 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2437,33 +2437,49 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
> int err;
> int i = 0;
>
> - if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
> - return -EIO;
> + if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data)) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
>
> - zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
>
> mce_init_banks();
>
> err = subsys_system_register(&mce_subsys, NULL);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + goto err_out_mem;
>
> cpu_notifier_register_begin();
> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> err = mce_device_create(i);
> if (err) {
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
> - return err;
> + goto err_out_mem;
> }
> }
>
> register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
> - __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> + err = __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out_mem;
>
> /* register character device /dev/mcelog */
> - misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> + err = misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out_mem;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_out_mem:
> + free_cpumask_var(mce_device_initialized);
>
> +err_out:
> + pr_err("Unable to init device /dev/mcelog (rc: %d)\n", err);
> return err;
> }
> device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mathieu souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:47:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398447604-21471-1-git-send-email-mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
In this patch, unwindind is still not perfect from the
mce_device_create() calls. I guess, from this point, on error we should
call mce_device_remove on every created device. But I think this will
make the code rather complex. And I am not too confident on this kind of
modification as I don't know much about MCE.
Mathieu S.
Le 25/04/2014 19:40, Mathieu Souchaud a écrit :
> Check return code of every function called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 68317c8..b865285 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2437,33 +2437,49 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
> int err;
> int i = 0;
>
> - if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data))
> - return -EIO;
> + if (!mce_available(&boot_cpu_data)) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
>
> - zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mce_device_initialized, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
>
> mce_init_banks();
>
> err = subsys_system_register(&mce_subsys, NULL);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + goto err_out_mem;
>
> cpu_notifier_register_begin();
> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> err = mce_device_create(i);
> if (err) {
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
> - return err;
> + goto err_out_mem;
> }
> }
>
> register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
> - __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> + err = __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out_mem;
>
> /* register character device /dev/mcelog */
> - misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> + err = misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out_mem;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_out_mem:
> + free_cpumask_var(mce_device_initialized);
>
> +err_out:
> + pr_err("Unable to init device /dev/mcelog (rc: %d)\n", err);
> return err;
> }
> device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 17:40 [PATCH] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling Mathieu Souchaud
2014-04-25 17:40 ` Mathieu Souchaud
2014-04-25 17:47 ` mathieu souchaud [this message]
2014-04-25 17:47 ` mathieu souchaud
2014-04-28 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535A9FA0.6030104@free.fr \
--to=mattieu.souchaud@free.fr \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.