From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
To: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
chow.kim@samsung.com, Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>,
VIKAS SAJJANC <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5360A7C8.1080407@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHxfkegFzzJCz4nAkxrHT6FGT0OQ-5RkCdTA3ruo2kU8CA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sachin,
On 04/30/2014 03:00 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> On 30 April 2014 10:47, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote:
>> As machine function ops are used only in this file let's make
>> them static.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> index 3d69e8d..06dcce5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>> +static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> u32 val = 0x1;
>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>> platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>> }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>> {
>> if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
>> /* to be supported later */
>> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
>> iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc));
>> }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> {
>> debug_ll_io_init();
>
> The declarations from common.h should also be removed in this patch to
> avoid the below
> build errors:
Thanks. I will merge changes in common.h in this patch itself.
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:198:13: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_restart’ follows non-static declaration
> static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:22:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_restart’ was here
> void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd);
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:235:20: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_late’ follows non-static declaration
> static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:25:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_late’ was here
> void exynos_init_late(void);
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:296:20: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_io’ follows non-static declaration
> static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:21:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_io’ was here
> void exynos_init_io(void);
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Pankaj Dubey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (Pankaj Dubey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5360A7C8.1080407@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHxfkegFzzJCz4nAkxrHT6FGT0OQ-5RkCdTA3ruo2kU8CA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sachin,
On 04/30/2014 03:00 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> On 30 April 2014 10:47, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote:
>> As machine function ops are used only in this file let's make
>> them static.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> index 3d69e8d..06dcce5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>> +static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> u32 val = 0x1;
>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>> platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>> }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>> {
>> if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
>> /* to be supported later */
>> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
>> iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc));
>> }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> {
>> debug_ll_io_init();
>
> The declarations from common.h should also be removed in this patch to
> avoid the below
> build errors:
Thanks. I will merge changes in common.h in this patch itself.
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:198:13: error: static declaration of
> ?exynos_restart? follows non-static declaration
> static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:22:6: note: previous declaration of
> ?exynos_restart? was here
> void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd);
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:235:20: error: static declaration of
> ?exynos_init_late? follows non-static declaration
> static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:25:6: note: previous declaration of
> ?exynos_init_late? was here
> void exynos_init_late(void);
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:296:20: error: static declaration of
> ?exynos_init_io? follows non-static declaration
> static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:21:6: note: previous declaration of
> ?exynos_init_io? was here
> void exynos_init_io(void);
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Pankaj Dubey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 5:17 [PATCH v3 00/12] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 6:00 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-04-30 6:00 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-04-30 7:35 ` Pankaj Dubey [this message]
2014-04-30 7:35 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Cleanup "mach-exynos/common.h" file Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Move SYSREG definition into sys-reg specific file Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove file path from comment section Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 8:41 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-04-30 8:41 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove regs-pmu.h header dependency from pm_domain Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove "linux/bug.h" from pmu.c Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Refactored code for using PMU address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Move "mach/map.h" inclusion from regs-pmu.h to platsmp.c Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 6:05 ` Vikas Sajjan
2014-04-30 6:05 ` Vikas Sajjan
2014-05-01 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-01 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Move PMU specific definitions from common.h Pankaj Dubey
2014-04-30 5:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-03 1:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-03 1:52 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-03 1:52 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-05-03 2:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-03 2:14 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5360A7C8.1080407@samsung.com \
--to=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=chow.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=vikas.sajjan@samsung.com \
--cc=yg1004.jang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.