From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 09:46:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5367A445.9070209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140505135239.GB22287@thunk.org>
On 5/5/14, 8:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:41:01PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 May 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 09:04:02 -0400
>>> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>>> To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file
>>
>> Description is missing.
>
> I didn't think more of a description was needed; can you suggest one?
Well, sometimes the summary is enough - if this patch just added a printf,
the summary covers the functional change. However, I think it's useful
to see the rationale for a change, not just the description of the change.
"Close file descriptors before exit" doesn't really need any rationale,
but changing program behavior and/or output might.
AFAIK, nobody ever complained that a changelog was too descriptive or
informative. ;)
>>> /* Can't undo discard ... */
>>> - if (!noaction && discard && (io_ptr != undo_io_manager)) {
>>> + if (!noaction && discard && dev_size && (io_ptr != undo_io_manager)) {
>>
>> I wonder whether it's possible not to have dev_size set at this point ?
>
> I checked, and I don't believe so. ext2fs_get_device_size2() never
> returns EXT2_ET_UNIMPLEMENTED any more; and it hasn't for quite some
> time, since it will use st_size for a regular file or do a binary
> search trying to figure out the device size in the worst case. So in
> fact, there are some code paths we can eliminate in misc/mke2fs.c
> which will simplify this analysis.
>
> Even if there is some case in the future where dev_size could be left
> unset, it will be initialized to zero, at which point we will fail
> safe by skipping the mke2fs_discard_device() call.
I kind of lost the thread here; if it is impossible to be unset, why
add the check?
And if (!dev_size) what would happen on this path? I guess I need to get
all the pending patches applied to see what's changed in this area.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 13:04 [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] mke2fs: print extra information about existing ext2/3/4 file systems Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:45 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:17 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:38 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:51 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 16:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-05-05 17:50 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-05 18:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-06 7:44 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-05 16:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-05-05 13:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] mke2fs: check for a partition table and warn if present Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:52 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:11 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-06 12:20 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-06 12:52 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:04 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-05-05 14:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5367A445.9070209@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.