All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris BREZILLON)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 22:43:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53694978.3050303@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aed75d16aa46476eb6f6c5b0d4bef30d@BLUPR05MB037.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On 06/05/2014 21:06, Bryan Evenson wrote:
> Boris,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Boris BREZILLON [mailto:boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:28 AM
>> To: Bryan Evenson
>> Cc: Andrew Victor; Nicolas Ferre; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org; Alessandro Zummo; rtc-
>> linux at googlegroups.com; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Boris BREZILLON
>> Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
>>
>> The rtc user must wait at least 1 sec between each time/calandar update
>> (see atmel's datasheet chapter "Updating Time/Calendar").
>>
>> Use the 1Hz interrupt to update the at91_rtc_upd_rdy flag and wait for
>> the at91_rtc_wait_upd_rdy event if the rtc is not ready.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>> Reported-by: Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com>
>> ---
>> Hello Bryan,
>>
>> I reproduced your bug (using your script) and this patch seems to fix the
>> problem.
>>
>> Could you try it and let me know if it works for you ?
> Looks good to me.  I modified the test script as follows:
>
> ----------
> #!/bin/sh
> i=0
> while [ 1 ]; do
>   hwclock -w -u > /dev/null 2>&1
>   echo $$ $i $?
>   : $((i++))
> done
> ----------
>
> This version then attempts to write to the RTC as often as possible (script change was due to a suggestion on the Busybox mailing list).  I ran two instances of the script, which each looped through about 60,000 times over a 30 minute run.  At no point has access to the RTC been permanently locked out on my system.  I'd call this fixed.

Great!

> I'd assume this patch would be backported to the longterm releases?

I'd like to wait for Nicolas' ack before asking for a backport to stable
releases.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com>
Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 22:43:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53694978.3050303@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aed75d16aa46476eb6f6c5b0d4bef30d@BLUPR05MB037.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On 06/05/2014 21:06, Bryan Evenson wrote:
> Boris,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Boris BREZILLON [mailto:boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:28 AM
>> To: Bryan Evenson
>> Cc: Andrew Victor; Nicolas Ferre; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; linux-arm-
>> kernel@lists.infradead.org; Alessandro Zummo; rtc-
>> linux@googlegroups.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Boris BREZILLON
>> Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
>>
>> The rtc user must wait at least 1 sec between each time/calandar update
>> (see atmel's datasheet chapter "Updating Time/Calendar").
>>
>> Use the 1Hz interrupt to update the at91_rtc_upd_rdy flag and wait for
>> the at91_rtc_wait_upd_rdy event if the rtc is not ready.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>> Reported-by: Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com>
>> ---
>> Hello Bryan,
>>
>> I reproduced your bug (using your script) and this patch seems to fix the
>> problem.
>>
>> Could you try it and let me know if it works for you ?
> Looks good to me.  I modified the test script as follows:
>
> ----------
> #!/bin/sh
> i=0
> while [ 1 ]; do
>   hwclock -w -u > /dev/null 2>&1
>   echo $$ $i $?
>   : $((i++))
> done
> ----------
>
> This version then attempts to write to the RTC as often as possible (script change was due to a suggestion on the Busybox mailing list).  I ran two instances of the script, which each looped through about 60,000 times over a 30 minute run.  At no point has access to the RTC been permanently locked out on my system.  I'd call this fixed.

Great!

> I'd assume this patch would be backported to the longterm releases?

I'd like to wait for Nicolas' ack before asking for a backport to stable
releases.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-06 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-05 18:55 [BUG] at91: rtc: Uinterruptable sleep state on hwclock -w -u Bryan Evenson
2014-05-05 20:23 ` [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix lost ACKUPD interrupt Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-05 20:23   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-05 20:44   ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-05 20:44     ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 11:36   ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 11:36     ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 12:22   ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 12:22     ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 14:28     ` [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-06 14:28       ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-06 19:06       ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 19:06         ` Bryan Evenson
2014-05-06 20:43         ` Boris BREZILLON [this message]
2014-05-06 20:43           ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-06 21:10         ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-06 21:10           ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-07  8:03           ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-07  8:03             ` Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53694978.3050303@free-electrons.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.