All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 14:50:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B7DA4.5060008@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399553109-6487-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>

Sent with wrong Rafael's address, please ignore this thread. Just resent
with correct address. Sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
Tomasz

On 08.05.2014 14:45, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Up till now there was no single generic method to bind devices to their
> power domains using Device Tree. Each platform has been doing this using
> its own way, example of which are Exynos power domain bindings [1] and
> look-up code [2].
> 
> This series is intended to change this and provide generic DT bindings for
> power domain specification and generic code performing look-up of power
> domains and binding them to devices.
> 
> First two patches are the most important part of this series, as they
> introduce $subject. Patch 3 converts mach-exynos to use the new generic
> method. Further patches are adding one more user of the new code,
> mach-s3c64xx, with first 3 patches (4-6) required to clean-up its power
> domain driver a bit and last 3 patches (9-11) adding display support for
> Mini6410 board, including a node for display controller (FIMD) which is
> a power domain consumer.
> 
> The design of DT bindings and provider code is heavily inspired by
> implementation of clock providers in Common Clock Framework, while
> the code binding devices to power domains by my Exynos power domain
> implementation (now removed by this series ;)).
> 
> Successfully tested on Exynos4210-based Trats and Exynos4412-based Trats2
> boards using MFC, 
> 
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> [2] arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c
> 
> Changes since v3:
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/44571)
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch (0a112bf),
>  - renamed "power-domain" property to "power-domains" to facilitate further
>    extension to support multiple power domains per device in future.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1658926)
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch,
>  - dropped patches for s3c64xx for now. I will send them in separate series,
>  - do not call pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(true) in genpd_bind_domain(),
>  - fixed various stylistic issues reported in review comments.
> 
> Changes since v1 (RFC):
> [https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/11/141]
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch,
>  - reordered the patches a bit (to have the generic ones first),
>  - dropped renaming of S3C64xx power domains (as suggested by Mark Brown),
>  - added support for deferred probing (as suggested by Stephen Boyd),
>  - fixed several minor issues pointed by Stephen Boyd,
>  - replaced notifiers with direct hooks in driver core to make power domain
>    support independent from specific bus type and allow error handling.
> 
> Tomasz Figa (3):
>   base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up
>   drivercore: Bind/unbind power domain on probe/remove
>   ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings
> 
>  .../bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt           |  12 +-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt     |  51 ++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c                  |  81 +-----
>  drivers/base/dd.c                                  |   9 +-
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c                        | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm_domain.h                          |  46 ++++
>  kernel/power/Kconfig                               |   4 +
>  7 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 14:50:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B7DA4.5060008@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399553109-6487-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>

Sent with wrong Rafael's address, please ignore this thread. Just resent
with correct address. Sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
Tomasz

On 08.05.2014 14:45, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Up till now there was no single generic method to bind devices to their
> power domains using Device Tree. Each platform has been doing this using
> its own way, example of which are Exynos power domain bindings [1] and
> look-up code [2].
> 
> This series is intended to change this and provide generic DT bindings for
> power domain specification and generic code performing look-up of power
> domains and binding them to devices.
> 
> First two patches are the most important part of this series, as they
> introduce $subject. Patch 3 converts mach-exynos to use the new generic
> method. Further patches are adding one more user of the new code,
> mach-s3c64xx, with first 3 patches (4-6) required to clean-up its power
> domain driver a bit and last 3 patches (9-11) adding display support for
> Mini6410 board, including a node for display controller (FIMD) which is
> a power domain consumer.
> 
> The design of DT bindings and provider code is heavily inspired by
> implementation of clock providers in Common Clock Framework, while
> the code binding devices to power domains by my Exynos power domain
> implementation (now removed by this series ;)).
> 
> Successfully tested on Exynos4210-based Trats and Exynos4412-based Trats2
> boards using MFC, 
> 
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> [2] arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c
> 
> Changes since v3:
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/44571)
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch (0a112bf),
>  - renamed "power-domain" property to "power-domains" to facilitate further
>    extension to support multiple power domains per device in future.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1658926)
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch,
>  - dropped patches for s3c64xx for now. I will send them in separate series,
>  - do not call pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(true) in genpd_bind_domain(),
>  - fixed various stylistic issues reported in review comments.
> 
> Changes since v1 (RFC):
> [https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/11/141]
>  - rebased onto current Rafael's linux-pm bleeding-edge branch,
>  - reordered the patches a bit (to have the generic ones first),
>  - dropped renaming of S3C64xx power domains (as suggested by Mark Brown),
>  - added support for deferred probing (as suggested by Stephen Boyd),
>  - fixed several minor issues pointed by Stephen Boyd,
>  - replaced notifiers with direct hooks in driver core to make power domain
>    support independent from specific bus type and allow error handling.
> 
> Tomasz Figa (3):
>   base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up
>   drivercore: Bind/unbind power domain on probe/remove
>   ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings
> 
>  .../bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt           |  12 +-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt     |  51 ++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c                  |  81 +-----
>  drivers/base/dd.c                                  |   9 +-
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c                        | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm_domain.h                          |  46 ++++
>  kernel/power/Kconfig                               |   4 +
>  7 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-08 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-08 12:45 [PATCH v4 0/3] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] base: power: Add generic OF-based " Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drivercore: Bind/unbind power domain on probe/remove Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45   ` Tomasz Figa
     [not found] ` <1399553109-6487-1-git-send-email-t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-08 12:45   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:45     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:50 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-05-08 12:50   ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-08 12:49 Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 12:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-17  1:23 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-17  1:23   ` Tomasz Figa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536B7DA4.5060008@samsung.com \
    --to=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.