From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: "Paul Bolle" <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, t.figa@samsung.com,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
mturquette@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1 3/9] ARM: S3C24XX: enable usage of common dclk if common clock framework is enabled
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 19:53:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536D1611.4010301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399654181.19276.2.camel@x220>
On 09.05.2014 18:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:09 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Add platform device and select the correct implementation automatically
>> depending on wether the old samsung_clock or the common clock framework
>> is enabled.
>>
>> This is only done for machines already using the old dclk implementation,
>> as everybody else should move to use dt anyway.
>>
>> The machine-specific settings for the external clocks will have to be set
>> by somebody with knowledge about the specific hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>
> It seems this one just hit linux-next (in next-20140509).
>
Which is bad, because:
a) it conflicts with patches already applied in samsung-clk tree,
b) the DT binding added by patch 4/9 has not been acked .
Kukjin, might I ask you to drop this series from your tree and let me
send you a pull request with necessary dependencies and this series
applied properly to resolve merge conflicts, as I suggested before in
one of my replies to this thread?
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2.1 3/9] ARM: S3C24XX: enable usage of common dclk if common clock framework is enabled
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 19:53:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536D1611.4010301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399654181.19276.2.camel@x220>
On 09.05.2014 18:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:09 +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>> Add platform device and select the correct implementation automatically
>> depending on wether the old samsung_clock or the common clock framework
>> is enabled.
>>
>> This is only done for machines already using the old dclk implementation,
>> as everybody else should move to use dt anyway.
>>
>> The machine-specific settings for the external clocks will have to be set
>> by somebody with knowledge about the specific hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>
> It seems this one just hit linux-next (in next-20140509).
>
Which is bad, because:
a) it conflicts with patches already applied in samsung-clk tree,
b) the DT binding added by patch 4/9 has not been acked .
Kukjin, might I ask you to drop this series from your tree and let me
send you a pull request with necessary dependencies and this series
applied properly to resolve merge conflicts, as I suggested before in
one of my replies to this thread?
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 19:32 [PATCH v2 0/9] ARM: S3C24XX: convert s3c2410, s3c2440 s3c2442 to common clock framework Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:32 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ARM: S3C24XX: cpufreq-utils: don't write raw values to MPLLCON when using ccf Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:34 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-23 20:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-23 20:55 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-23 20:55 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-23 21:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 21:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-06 4:27 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-06 4:27 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-06 15:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-06 15:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 17:36 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-08 17:36 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-23 21:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-23 21:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-23 22:08 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 22:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] clk: samsung: add clock driver for external clock outputs Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:34 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ARM: S3C24XX: enable usage of common dclk if common clock framework is enabled Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:35 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:09 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:09 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 16:49 ` Paul Bolle
2014-05-09 16:49 ` Paul Bolle
2014-05-09 17:53 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-05-09 17:53 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-09 23:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 23:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 23:11 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-09 23:11 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-09 23:33 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 23:33 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-12 22:47 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-12 22:47 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-12 22:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-12 22:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 22:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-09 22:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: add documentation for s3c2410 clock controller Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:36 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-05-06 15:19 ` [ATTN] " Tomasz Figa
2014-05-06 15:19 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-23 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] clk: samsung: add clock controller driver for s3c2410, s3c2440 and s3c2442 Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:36 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] ARM: S3C24XX: add platform code for conversion to the common clock framework Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:37 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: S3C24XX: convert s3c2440 and s3c2442 to " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:37 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: S3C24XX: convert s3c2410 " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:10 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:10 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: S3C24XX: remove legacy clock code Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 19:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:11 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-04-23 20:11 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536D1611.4010301@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.