From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, joelf@ti.com
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, vinod.koul@intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
tony@atomide.com, bcousson@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM/DT: edma: Get IP configuration from hardware
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:26:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5371F35B.6090909@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5371D8D8.8000003@ti.com>
On 05/13/2014 11:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 01:13 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are requesting redundant information via DT for the driver since the very same
>> data is available in the HW: by reading and decoding the content of CCCFG
>> register we can get:
>> Number of channels: NUM_DMACH
>> Number of regions: NUM_REGN
>> Number of slots (PaRAM sets): NUM_PAENTRY
>> Number of TC/EQ: NUM_EVQUE
>>
>> So these does not need to be provided by the DT binding.
>>
>> The driver will no longer look for these properties from DT and they can be
>> removed from the binding documentation and from the dtsi files as well.
>> The change will not introduce regression when new kernel is booted using older
>> DTB (since we just ignore the mentioned properties).
>
> Peter, to which baseline do these patches apply? I tried applying them
> to v3.15-rc5 but 1/4 doesn't apply cleanly.
It is on top of next-20140509.
Now that I looked at my branch, I missed one small patch from the series which
could cause the issue (removing the memset from edma_of_parse_dt).
I'll resend ASAP with that patch included.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
--
Péter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM/DT: edma: Get IP configuration from hardware
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:26:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5371F35B.6090909@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5371D8D8.8000003@ti.com>
On 05/13/2014 11:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 01:13 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are requesting redundant information via DT for the driver since the very same
>> data is available in the HW: by reading and decoding the content of CCCFG
>> register we can get:
>> Number of channels: NUM_DMACH
>> Number of regions: NUM_REGN
>> Number of slots (PaRAM sets): NUM_PAENTRY
>> Number of TC/EQ: NUM_EVQUE
>>
>> So these does not need to be provided by the DT binding.
>>
>> The driver will no longer look for these properties from DT and they can be
>> removed from the binding documentation and from the dtsi files as well.
>> The change will not introduce regression when new kernel is booted using older
>> DTB (since we just ignore the mentioned properties).
>
> Peter, to which baseline do these patches apply? I tried applying them
> to v3.15-rc5 but 1/4 doesn't apply cleanly.
It is on top of next-20140509.
Now that I looked at my branch, I missed one small patch from the series which
could cause the issue (removing the memset from edma_of_parse_dt).
I'll resend ASAP with that patch included.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
--
P?ter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, <joelf@ti.com>
Cc: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<tony@atomide.com>, <bcousson@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM/DT: edma: Get IP configuration from hardware
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:26:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5371F35B.6090909@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5371D8D8.8000003@ti.com>
On 05/13/2014 11:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 01:13 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are requesting redundant information via DT for the driver since the very same
>> data is available in the HW: by reading and decoding the content of CCCFG
>> register we can get:
>> Number of channels: NUM_DMACH
>> Number of regions: NUM_REGN
>> Number of slots (PaRAM sets): NUM_PAENTRY
>> Number of TC/EQ: NUM_EVQUE
>>
>> So these does not need to be provided by the DT binding.
>>
>> The driver will no longer look for these properties from DT and they can be
>> removed from the binding documentation and from the dtsi files as well.
>> The change will not introduce regression when new kernel is booted using older
>> DTB (since we just ignore the mentioned properties).
>
> Peter, to which baseline do these patches apply? I tried applying them
> to v3.15-rc5 but 1/4 doesn't apply cleanly.
It is on top of next-20140509.
Now that I looked at my branch, I missed one small patch from the series which
could cause the issue (removing the memset from edma_of_parse_dt).
I'll resend ASAP with that patch included.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 7:43 [PATCH 0/4] ARM/DT: edma: Get IP configuration from hardware Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: edma: Get IP information from HW when booting with DT Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] dt/bindings: ti,edma: Remove redundant properties from documentation Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] dt/bindings: ti, edma: " Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: am33xx: Remove obsolete properties from edma node Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: am4372: " Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 7:43 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 8:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM/DT: edma: Get IP configuration from hardware Sekhar Nori
2014-05-13 8:33 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-05-13 8:33 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-05-13 10:26 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2014-05-13 10:26 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-05-13 10:26 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5371F35B.6090909@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joelf@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.