From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: Add of_device_destroy_children() function
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:55:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537359B1.1060908@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514102754.BC60BC4153D@trevor.secretlab.ca>
On 14/05/14 12:27, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014 18:37:49 +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds a helper function to unregister devices which
>> > were created by an of_platform_populate() call. The pattern
>> > used here can already be found in multiple drivers. This helper
>> > can now be used instead of repeating similar code in drivers.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> > ---
>
> Pawel has also submitted a patch for this. That patch is a little more
> careful about how it removes nodes, so I'll be going with that one.
OK, it's good to know we have already a good solution. I'll give a try
Pawel's patch then.
Thanks,
Sylwester
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add of_device_destroy_children() function
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:55:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537359B1.1060908@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514102754.BC60BC4153D@trevor.secretlab.ca>
On 14/05/14 12:27, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014 18:37:49 +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds a helper function to unregister devices which
>> > were created by an of_platform_populate() call. The pattern
>> > used here can already be found in multiple drivers. This helper
>> > can now be used instead of repeating similar code in drivers.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> > ---
>
> Pawel has also submitted a patch for this. That patch is a little more
> careful about how it removes nodes, so I'll be going with that one.
OK, it's good to know we have already a good solution. I'll give a try
Pawel's patch then.
Thanks,
Sylwester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-08 16:37 [PATCH] of: Add of_device_destroy_children() function Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-05-08 16:37 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-05-08 16:37 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-05-08 20:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-08 20:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-08 20:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-09 9:53 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-05-09 9:53 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-05-14 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-14 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-14 10:27 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-14 10:27 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-14 10:27 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-14 11:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2014-05-14 11:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537359B1.1060908@samsung.com \
--to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.