From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
J Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: make return of 0 explicit
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 08:08:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5379BC0C.3070401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140519074155.GO15585@mwanda>
On 05/19/2014 10:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This one does feel like a bug in the original code as you mention. I
> have added the TI devs to the CC list so they can help us.
Yes this is a bug, the dra7_apll_enable() should return some sort of
error code if the lock fails. EBUSY maybe?
-Tero
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:05AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
>> the fact that the result is always 0.
>>
>> Additionally dropped some unneeded braces in an affected if.
>>
>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
>> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @r exists@
>> local idexpression ret;
>> expression e;
>> position p;
>> @@
>>
>> -ret = 0;
>> ... when != ret = e
>> return
>> - ret
>> + 0
>> ;
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> ---
>> Alternatively, is an error code wanted in either of the MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES
>> cases?
>>
>> drivers/clk/ti/apll.c | 13 +++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> index b986f61..659032a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>> static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> {
>> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
>> - int r = 0, i = 0;
>> + int i = 0;
>> struct dpll_data *ad;
>> const char *clk_name;
>> u8 state = 1;
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->idlest_reg);
>>
>> if ((v & ad->idlest_mask) = state)
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->control_reg);
>> v &= ~ad->enable_mask;
>> @@ -74,17 +74,14 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> udelay(1);
>> }
>>
>> - if (i = MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES) {
>> + if (i = MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES)
>> pr_warn("clock: %s failed transition to '%s'\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed");
>> - } else {
>> + else
>> pr_debug("clock: %s transition to '%s' in %d loops\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed", i);
>>
>> - r = 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static void dra7_apll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
J Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: make return of 0 explicit
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:08:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5379BC0C.3070401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140519074155.GO15585@mwanda>
On 05/19/2014 10:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This one does feel like a bug in the original code as you mention. I
> have added the TI devs to the CC list so they can help us.
Yes this is a bug, the dra7_apll_enable() should return some sort of
error code if the lock fails. EBUSY maybe?
-Tero
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:05AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
>> the fact that the result is always 0.
>>
>> Additionally dropped some unneeded braces in an affected if.
>>
>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
>> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @r exists@
>> local idexpression ret;
>> expression e;
>> position p;
>> @@
>>
>> -ret = 0;
>> ... when != ret = e
>> return
>> - ret
>> + 0
>> ;
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> ---
>> Alternatively, is an error code wanted in either of the MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES
>> cases?
>>
>> drivers/clk/ti/apll.c | 13 +++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> index b986f61..659032a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>> static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> {
>> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
>> - int r = 0, i = 0;
>> + int i = 0;
>> struct dpll_data *ad;
>> const char *clk_name;
>> u8 state = 1;
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->idlest_reg);
>>
>> if ((v & ad->idlest_mask) == state)
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->control_reg);
>> v &= ~ad->enable_mask;
>> @@ -74,17 +74,14 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> udelay(1);
>> }
>>
>> - if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES) {
>> + if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES)
>> pr_warn("clock: %s failed transition to '%s'\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed");
>> - } else {
>> + else
>> pr_debug("clock: %s transition to '%s' in %d loops\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed", i);
>>
>> - r = 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static void dra7_apll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 4:31 [PATCH 0/13] make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:43 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 7:43 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 12:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-19 12:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-19 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-19 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 12:32 ` [PATCH] libertas: fix return value when processing invalid packet Dan Williams
2014-05-22 12:32 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 21:57 ` James Cameron
2014-05-22 21:57 ` James Cameron
2014-05-20 0:30 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 0:30 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 0:36 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 0:36 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-19 7:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-19 8:08 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2014-05-19 8:08 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-19 11:25 ` [PATCH] CLK: TI: DRA7: return error code in failure case Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 11:25 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 12:23 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-19 12:23 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-28 21:47 ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-28 21:47 ` Mike Turquette
2014-06-19 11:24 ` Tero Kristo
2014-06-19 11:24 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 4/13] wimax/i2400m: make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:47 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 7:47 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 11:30 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 11:30 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 13:22 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 13:22 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 12:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-19 12:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-20 0:44 ` [PATCH 4/13 v2] " Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 0:44 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-21 21:19 ` David Miller
2014-05-21 21:19 ` David Miller
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 5/13] usb: gadget: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 6/13] [NETFILTER]: arp_tables: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-29 12:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-29 12:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-29 12:37 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-29 12:37 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 7/13] staging: wlags49_h2: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 8/13] sound: mpu401.c: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 8:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-19 8:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-19 8:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 9/13] md: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 5:45 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-20 5:45 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 10/13] staging: rtl8192e: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 11/13] ufs: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 12/13] brcmsmac: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 13/13] s390/irq: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 6:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-05-19 6:03 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5379BC0C.3070401@ti.com \
--to=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.