All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arvind Chauhan <Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com>,
	"inderpal.s@samsung.com" <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
	"nm@ti.com" <nm@ti.com>,
	"chander.kashyap@linaro.org" <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>,
	"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:42:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537CBB4C.7000006@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=-kmfH9Z+m8E9HQXs4AvRoUCDzcrns6-HHLH=AqeJ-DQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 21/05/14 15:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 19:15, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> [Nit] Not sure if we need this logging on each cpu, may be dev_dbg if you
>> still
>> fancy one ? :)
>
> It wouldn't happen on each CPU, but one CPU per policy as others
> would return -ENODEV.
>

Hmm agreed, but there are SoCs that support per CPU DVFS ;)

> I added dev_dbg earlier but then I thought dev_info is better as we may
> better show this to everybody as it about the most important device,
> i.e. CPU :)
>
>>> +       /* Print error only if there is an issue with OPP table */
>>> +       else if (error != -ENOSYS && error != -ENODEV)
>>> +               dev_err(&cpu->dev, "%s: failed to init OPP table for
>>> cpu%d, err: %d\n",
>>> +                       __func__, cpu->dev.id, error);
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu) {}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>
>>
>> IMO this could be more generic and applicable for any device if you replace
>> "struct cpu" with "struct device". I know this is currently used by cpu but
>> we can extend it's use for any device if needed in future. You can then move
>> this to pm_opp.h as of_init_dev_opp_table may be.
>
> Probably we will call of_init_opp_table() directly for other devices, as this
> function doesn't do anything else, apart from some prints.. So, probably
> leave is as is for now, unless a real need arises ?
>

I don't see anything cpu specific there, but that's just my opinion.

Regards,
Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-21 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-21 11:09 [PATCH V2 0/7] CPUFreq: Initialize CPU's OPP tables from CPU core Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:09 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] opp: remove -ENOSYS from dummy implementation of of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:16   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 13:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] opp: handle of_node_{get|put}() inside of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:45   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:01     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:42       ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-05-21 14:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 17:26   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-22  4:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:35   ` Inderpal Singh
2014-05-21 13:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:07   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:16     ` Shawn Guo
2014-05-21 14:31       ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos5440: " Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537CBB4C.7000006@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
    --cc=chander.kashyap@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.