From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com>,
"inderpal.s@samsung.com" <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
"nm@ti.com" <nm@ti.com>,
"chander.kashyap@linaro.org" <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:26:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537CE1C4.9050008@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b59df199b373191791afcccd627d900ce07afa71.1400670427.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 21/05/14 12:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> All drivers expecting CPU's OPPs from device tree initialize OPP table using
> of_init_opp_table() and there is nothing driver specific in that. They all do it
> in the same way adding to code redundancy.
>
> It would be better if we can get rid of code redundancy by initializing CPU OPPs
> from core code for all CPUs that have a "operating-points" property defined in
> their node.
>
> This patch initializes OPPs as soon as CPU device is registered in
> register_cpu().
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 006b1bc..853e99e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>
> #include "base.h"
>
> @@ -322,6 +323,25 @@ static int cpu_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP) && defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu)
> +{
> + int error;
> +
> + /* Initialize CPU's OPP table */
> + error = of_init_opp_table(&cpu->dev);
> + if (!error)
> + dev_info(&cpu->dev, "%s: created OPP table for cpu: %d\n",
> + __func__, cpu->dev.id);
> + /* Print error only if there is an issue with OPP table */
> + else if (error != -ENOSYS && error != -ENODEV)
> + dev_err(&cpu->dev, "%s: failed to init OPP table for cpu%d, err: %d\n",
> + __func__, cpu->dev.id, error);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu) {}
Sorry I missed this earlier, main idea of this wrapper is not to have any
config dependency and hide error handling details for non-DT platforms. Since
of_init_opp_table has dummy implementation, you really don't need this dummy
implementation again here.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 11:09 [PATCH V2 0/7] CPUFreq: Initialize CPU's OPP tables from CPU core Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:09 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] opp: remove -ENOSYS from dummy implementation of of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] opp: handle of_node_{get|put}() inside of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 17:26 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-05-22 4:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:35 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-05-21 13:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:16 ` Shawn Guo
2014-05-21 14:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos5440: " Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537CE1C4.9050008@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com \
--cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
--cc=chander.kashyap@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.