All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs/superblock: Unregister sb shrinker before ->kill_sb()
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:52:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537E1D4E.4040407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400749779-24879-2-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

On 05/22/2014 05:09 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> 
> We will like to unregister the sb shrinker before ->kill_sb().
> This will allow cached objects to be counted without call to
> grab_super_passive() to update ref count on sb. We want
> to avoid locking during memory reclamation especially when
> we are skipping the memory reclaim when we are out of
> cached objects.

> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs/superblock: Unregister sb shrinker before ->kill_sb()
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:52:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537E1D4E.4040407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400749779-24879-2-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

On 05/22/2014 05:09 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> 
> We will like to unregister the sb shrinker before ->kill_sb().
> This will allow cached objects to be counted without call to
> grab_super_passive() to update ref count on sb. We want
> to avoid locking during memory reclamation especially when
> we are skipping the memory reclaim when we are out of
> cached objects.

> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-22 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22  9:09 [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim Mel Gorman
2014-05-22  9:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs/superblock: Unregister sb shrinker before ->kill_sb() Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 15:52   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-05-22 15:52     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22  9:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/superblock: Avoid locking counting inodes and dentries before reclaiming them Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 15:59   ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 15:59     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22  9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: vmscan: Use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full scan at DEF_PRIORITY Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 16:04   ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 16:04     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 16:14   ` Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 16:14   ` Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 16:30   ` Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 16:30     ` Mel Gorman
2014-05-23  2:43     ` Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-23  2:43       ` Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2014-05-22 17:22   ` Tim Chen
2014-05-26 21:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-26 21:44   ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27  2:37   ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-27  2:37     ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-27 21:17     ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27 21:17       ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27 23:02       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-05-27 23:02         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-05-27 23:19         ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27 23:19           ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-28  1:37           ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-28  1:37             ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537E1D4E.4040407@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.