From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: berlin: add pinctrl support
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 01:14:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537E84F3.6020207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda6-W6rNXtAbcTs6dgp4WLExXra6P_dqQbuYsRWi7MaOw@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/23/2014 12:11 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
> <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> but can you please drop the Berlin pinctrl patches
>> and reconsider taking the reworked driver instead?
>
> Sure I applied patches 1 thru 4 to the pin control tree.
> The rest you need to carry in some ARM SoC tree or
> similar.
Great, thanks. Having it in is a huge benefit as future device
drivers will depend on at least some pinctrl. Functionally it is
ok, Mike's request for clock node rework smashed my time schedule.
> I don't mind the driver being half-merged like this, because
> it means we can work on consolidating the utils code
> in the next cycle.
Sure, pinctrl properties consolidation is on my list for next
cycle.
Anyway, sorry for the late mess with it, I am still learning on
the first real arm/mach-maintainer cycle.
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
zhiming Xu <zmxu@marvell.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: berlin: add pinctrl support
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 01:14:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537E84F3.6020207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda6-W6rNXtAbcTs6dgp4WLExXra6P_dqQbuYsRWi7MaOw@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/23/2014 12:11 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
> <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> but can you please drop the Berlin pinctrl patches
>> and reconsider taking the reworked driver instead?
>
> Sure I applied patches 1 thru 4 to the pin control tree.
> The rest you need to carry in some ARM SoC tree or
> similar.
Great, thanks. Having it in is a huge benefit as future device
drivers will depend on at least some pinctrl. Functionally it is
ok, Mike's request for clock node rework smashed my time schedule.
> I don't mind the driver being half-merged like this, because
> it means we can work on consolidating the utils code
> in the next cycle.
Sure, pinctrl properties consolidation is on my list for next
cycle.
Anyway, sorry for the late mess with it, I am still learning on
the first real arm/mach-maintainer cycle.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 17:36 [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: berlin: add pinctrl support Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] pinctrl: berlin: add the core pinctrl driver for Marvell Berlin SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] pinctrl: berlin: add the BG2Q pinctrl driver Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] pinctrl: berlin: add the BG2 " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] pinctrl: berlin: add the BG2CD " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: berlin: add the pinctrl dependency for the Marvell Berlin SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] dt-binding: ARM: add pinctrl binding docs for Marvell Berlin2 SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-22 22:09 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-22 22:09 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-19 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: dts: berlin: add the pinctrl node and muxing setup for uarts Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-19 17:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-22 22:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: berlin: add pinctrl support Linus Walleij
2014-05-22 22:11 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-22 23:14 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2014-05-22 23:14 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537E84F3.6020207@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.