* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: remove some unused codes
@ 2014-05-23 2:21 Xue jiufei
2014-06-02 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xue jiufei @ 2014-05-23 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ocfs2-devel
Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 1 -
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 1 -
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 5 -----
3 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
index fa2bd21..fae17c6 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static inline int dlm_is_recovery_lock(const char *lock_name, int name_len)
struct dlm_recovery_ctxt
{
struct list_head resources;
- struct list_head received;
struct list_head node_data;
u8 new_master;
u8 dead_node;
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
index c973690..34fbbe5 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
@@ -2023,7 +2023,6 @@ static struct dlm_ctxt *dlm_alloc_ctxt(const char *domain,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->dirty_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->reco.resources);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->reco.received);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->reco.node_data);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->purge_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlm->dlm_domain_handlers);
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
index 6bd690b..52cfe99 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -2544,11 +2544,6 @@ int ocfs2_super_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
* refreshed, so we do it here. Of course, making sense of
* everything is up to the caller :) */
status = ocfs2_should_refresh_lock_res(lockres);
- if (status < 0) {
- ocfs2_cluster_unlock(osb, lockres, level);
- mlog_errno(status);
- goto bail;
- }
if (status) {
status = ocfs2_refresh_slot_info(osb);
--
1.8.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: remove some unused codes
2014-05-23 2:21 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: remove some unused codes Xue jiufei
@ 2014-06-02 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2014-06-02 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ocfs2-devel
On Fri, 23 May 2014 10:21:18 +0800 Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com> wrote:
Please write changelogs for the patches if they are not utterly obvious?
And part of this patch was not utterly obvious. So I wrote your changelog:
: dlm_recovery_ctxt.received is unused.
:
: ocfs2_should_refresh_lock_res() can only return 0 or 1, so the error
: handling code in ocfs2_super_lock() is unneeded.
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -2544,11 +2544,6 @@ int ocfs2_super_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> * refreshed, so we do it here. Of course, making sense of
> * everything is up to the caller :) */
> status = ocfs2_should_refresh_lock_res(lockres);
> - if (status < 0) {
> - ocfs2_cluster_unlock(osb, lockres, level);
> - mlog_errno(status);
> - goto bail;
> - }
> if (status) {
> status = ocfs2_refresh_slot_info(osb);
One does wonder if this is the correct fix. Perhaps
ocfs2_should_refresh_lock_res() should be checking something but forgot
to do so?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-02 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-23 2:21 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: remove some unused codes Xue jiufei
2014-06-02 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.