All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Exynos multi-platform support
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 06:33:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538261A5.60107@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537FB781.8050501@gmail.com>

On 05/24/14 06:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,

> On 23.05.2014 21:48, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> On 05/24/14 04:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 23 May 2014, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>> The patches in this series were earlier sent as part of other
>>>> series. Now that the other patches have been merged, re-sending
>>>> these after rebasing them on linux-next (20140523).
>>>> Tested on Exynos4210, 4412, 5250 and 5420 based boards.
>>>>
>>>> A particular change in this series is the removal of single platform
>>>> support for Exynos as suggested by Arnd and Olof (patch 2/3). With
>>>> this change certain features (drivers) which are not yet multi-platform
>>>> aware like cpufreq, devfreq and DRM based gscaler will not be available
>>>> now.
>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Yes, it's time to move on exynos multiplatform and we can't wait for
>> more perfect something. Anyway if any problems, let's fix them after
>> this. Will apply this whole series.
>
> I have tested v1 of this series on Exynos4210-TRATS and
> Exynos4412-TRATS2 boards and they seemed to work fine with added two
> patches that are already on the ML:
>   - [PATCH v2] cpufreq: exynos: Fix driver compilation with
> ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM,

Hmm...yeah, Thomas re-submitted v5 but the patches are depending on 
others which are not yet decided to apply for 3.16...maybe it can be 
upstreamed in 3.17?...

>   - [PATCH] drm/exynos/fimd: allow multiplatform configuration.
>
> Not tested too extensively, but primary features (boot, display, USB
> gadget, cpufreq) seem to work at first glance with the above patches.
>
Thanks for your test and OK, I'll queue this with multiplatform patches.

- Kukjin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Exynos multi-platform support
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 06:33:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538261A5.60107@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537FB781.8050501@gmail.com>

On 05/24/14 06:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,

> On 23.05.2014 21:48, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> On 05/24/14 04:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 23 May 2014, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>> The patches in this series were earlier sent as part of other
>>>> series. Now that the other patches have been merged, re-sending
>>>> these after rebasing them on linux-next (20140523).
>>>> Tested on Exynos4210, 4412, 5250 and 5420 based boards.
>>>>
>>>> A particular change in this series is the removal of single platform
>>>> support for Exynos as suggested by Arnd and Olof (patch 2/3). With
>>>> this change certain features (drivers) which are not yet multi-platform
>>>> aware like cpufreq, devfreq and DRM based gscaler will not be available
>>>> now.
>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Yes, it's time to move on exynos multiplatform and we can't wait for
>> more perfect something. Anyway if any problems, let's fix them after
>> this. Will apply this whole series.
>
> I have tested v1 of this series on Exynos4210-TRATS and
> Exynos4412-TRATS2 boards and they seemed to work fine with added two
> patches that are already on the ML:
>   - [PATCH v2] cpufreq: exynos: Fix driver compilation with
> ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM,

Hmm...yeah, Thomas re-submitted v5 but the patches are depending on 
others which are not yet decided to apply for 3.16...maybe it can be 
upstreamed in 3.17?...

>   - [PATCH] drm/exynos/fimd: allow multiplatform configuration.
>
> Not tested too extensively, but primary features (boot, display, USB
> gadget, cpufreq) seem to work at first glance with the above patches.
>
Thanks for your test and OK, I'll queue this with multiplatform patches.

- Kukjin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-25 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-23 15:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] Exynos multi-platform support Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Consolidate Kconfig entries Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19   ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable multi-platform build support Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19   ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable Exynos platform Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:19   ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Exynos multi-platform support Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 19:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 19:48   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-23 19:48     ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-23 21:02     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-23 21:02       ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-25 21:33       ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2014-05-25 21:33         ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538261A5.60107@samsung.com \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.