* [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
@ 2014-05-27 15:58 ` Jet Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jet Chen @ 2014-05-27 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2319 bytes --]
Hi Miklos,
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v22
commit 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886830c97a1dd4c184 ("vfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT")
test case: lkp-wsx01/will-it-scale/lseek2
9f498c77b4332b4 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886
--------------- -------------------------
0.63 ~ 0% -7.2% 0.58 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.scalability
12861563 ~ 0% -1.1% 12715565 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
958 ~11% -16.9% 796 ~18% TOTAL numa-meminfo.node3.PageTables
3013 ~11% +20.9% 3643 ~ 4% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
12055 ~11% +20.9% 14574 ~ 4% TOTAL numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
1734 ~ 5% -10.6% 1550 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.active_objs
1734 ~ 5% -10.6% 1550 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.num_objs
Legend:
~XX% - stddev percent
[+-]XX% - change percent
will-it-scale.scalability
0.63 ++----*---------*--------------*---*--------------*--*--*------------+
| .*. *...*. *..*..*.. + : .*. *..* |
0.62 *+ + : *..*. |
| * : .. |
| * |
0.61 ++ |
| |
0.6 ++ |
| |
0.59 ++ |
| O O O |
| O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0.58 O+ O O O O |
| O |
0.57 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Thanks,
Jet
[-- Attachment #2: reproduce.ksh --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5955 bytes --]
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu11/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu13/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu14/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu16/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu17/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu18/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu19/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu22/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu23/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu24/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu25/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu26/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu27/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu28/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu30/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu32/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu33/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu34/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu35/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu36/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu37/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu38/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu39/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu41/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu42/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu43/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu44/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu45/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu46/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu47/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu48/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu49/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu51/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu52/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu53/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu54/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu55/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu56/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu57/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu58/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu59/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu60/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu61/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu62/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu63/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu64/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu65/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu66/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu67/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu68/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu69/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu70/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu71/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu72/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu73/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu74/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu75/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu76/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu77/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu78/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu79/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu9/cpufreq/scaling_governor
./runtest.py lseek2 16 1 10 20 30 40 60 80
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
@ 2014-05-27 15:58 ` Jet Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jet Chen @ 2014-05-27 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: Fengguang Wu, LKML, lkp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2268 bytes --]
Hi Miklos,
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v22
commit 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886830c97a1dd4c184 ("vfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT")
test case: lkp-wsx01/will-it-scale/lseek2
9f498c77b4332b4 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886
--------------- -------------------------
0.63 ~ 0% -7.2% 0.58 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.scalability
12861563 ~ 0% -1.1% 12715565 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
958 ~11% -16.9% 796 ~18% TOTAL numa-meminfo.node3.PageTables
3013 ~11% +20.9% 3643 ~ 4% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
12055 ~11% +20.9% 14574 ~ 4% TOTAL numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
1734 ~ 5% -10.6% 1550 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.active_objs
1734 ~ 5% -10.6% 1550 ~ 4% TOTAL slabinfo.sock_inode_cache.num_objs
Legend:
~XX% - stddev percent
[+-]XX% - change percent
will-it-scale.scalability
0.63 ++----*---------*--------------*---*--------------*--*--*------------+
| .*. *...*. *..*..*.. + : .*. *..* |
0.62 *+ + : *..*. |
| * : .. |
| * |
0.61 ++ |
| |
0.6 ++ |
| |
0.59 ++ |
| O O O |
| O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0.58 O+ O O O O |
| O |
0.57 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Thanks,
Jet
[-- Attachment #2: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5955 bytes --]
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu11/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu13/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu14/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu16/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu17/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu18/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu19/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu22/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu23/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu24/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu25/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu26/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu27/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu28/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu30/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu32/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu33/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu34/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu35/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu36/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu37/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu38/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu39/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu41/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu42/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu43/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu44/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu45/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu46/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu47/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu48/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu49/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu51/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu52/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu53/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu54/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu55/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu56/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu57/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu58/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu59/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu60/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu61/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu62/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu63/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu64/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu65/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu66/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu67/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu68/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu69/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu70/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu71/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu72/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu73/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu74/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu75/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu76/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu77/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu78/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu79/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu9/cpufreq/scaling_governor
./runtest.py lseek2 16 1 10 20 30 40 60 80
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
2014-05-27 15:58 ` Jet Chen
@ 2014-05-27 16:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2014-05-27 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 23:58 +0800, Jet Chen wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v22
> commit 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886830c97a1dd4c184 ("vfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT")
>
> test case: lkp-wsx01/will-it-scale/lseek2
The only thing I see in that commit that could affect performance is the
slightly larger icache footprint of ext4_rename().
Is the regression reproducible across different -rc versions?
Thanks,
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
@ 2014-05-27 16:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2014-05-27 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jet Chen; +Cc: Fengguang Wu, LKML, lkp
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 23:58 +0800, Jet Chen wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v22
> commit 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886830c97a1dd4c184 ("vfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT")
>
> test case: lkp-wsx01/will-it-scale/lseek2
The only thing I see in that commit that could affect performance is the
slightly larger icache footprint of ext4_rename().
Is the regression reproducible across different -rc versions?
Thanks,
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
2014-05-27 15:58 ` Jet Chen
@ 2014-05-27 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2014-05-27 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 666 bytes --]
On 05/27/2014 08:58 AM, Jet Chen wrote:
> 9f498c77b4332b4 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886
> --------------- -------------------------
> 0.63 ~ 0% -7.2% 0.58 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.scalability
> 12861563 ~ 0% -1.1% 12715565 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
There's something funky here.
What are the numbers being factored in to 'will-it-scale.scalability'
and 'will-it-scale.per_process_ops'? Could you share the raw csv's that
will-it-scale generated?
Since 'per_process_ops' is only off by 1.1%, my suspicion is that some
consistent skew on the 1-process case is getting magnified in to the
scalability number.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability
@ 2014-05-27 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2014-05-27 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jet Chen, Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: Fengguang Wu, LKML, lkp
On 05/27/2014 08:58 AM, Jet Chen wrote:
> 9f498c77b4332b4 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886
> --------------- -------------------------
> 0.63 ~ 0% -7.2% 0.58 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.scalability
> 12861563 ~ 0% -1.1% 12715565 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
There's something funky here.
What are the numbers being factored in to 'will-it-scale.scalability'
and 'will-it-scale.per_process_ops'? Could you share the raw csv's that
will-it-scale generated?
Since 'per_process_ops' is only off by 1.1%, my suspicion is that some
consistent skew on the 1-process case is getting magnified in to the
scalability number.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-27 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-27 15:58 [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability Jet Chen
2014-05-27 15:58 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-27 16:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-27 16:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-05-27 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
2014-05-27 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.