[meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Chris Morgan]

Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.

Chris Morgan (2):
  dfu-util 0.7 recipe
  Remove old dfu-util 0.1 recipe

 meta-oe/recipes-support/dfu-util/dfu-util_0.1.bb | 10 ----------
 meta-oe/recipes-support/dfu-util/dfu-util_0.7.bb |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/dfu-util/dfu-util_0.1.bb
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/dfu-util/dfu-util_0.7.bb

-- 
1.9.3

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.

I'd prefer this in a single commit.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Gary Thomas]

On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
>
> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
>

I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
version 0.4 that is still left in place.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Chris Morgan]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
>>
>>
>> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
>>
>
> I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
> version 0.4 that is still left in place.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
> MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Correct.

I'm not introducing 0.7 to replace 0.1, I'm introducing 0.7 so I'm at
the same rev as my Fedora box. Just happened to notice that 0.1, which
is super old, was still present so thought we might remove that.

Chris

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Chris Morgan]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
>>>
>>
>> I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
>> version 0.4 that is still left in place.
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
>> MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
> Correct.
>
> I'm not introducing 0.7 to replace 0.1, I'm introducing 0.7 so I'm at
> the same rev as my Fedora box. Just happened to notice that 0.1, which
> is super old, was still present so thought we might remove that.
>
> Chris


And I can easily make them a single patch if thats what you want. Just
thought it was relatively easy to apply both patches.

Chris

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
>>>
>>
>> I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
>> version 0.4 that is still left in place.
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
>> MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
> Correct.
>
> I'm not introducing 0.7 to replace 0.1, I'm introducing 0.7 so I'm at
> the same rev as my Fedora box. Just happened to notice that 0.1, which
> is super old, was still present so thought we might remove that.

Great; makes sense.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Khem Raj]

On May 30, 2014 1:34 PM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>
> On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
>>
>>
>> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
>>
>
> I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
> version 0.4 that is still left in place.

is there a reason to keep 0.4 usually its better to maintain one recipe
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
> MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Chris Morgan]

On May 31, 2014 10:41 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2014 1:34 PM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2014-05-30 14:29, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Add a recipe for building 0.7, remove old 0.1 recipe.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd prefer this in a single commit.
> >>
> >
> > I think he did it this way because of the [slightly confusing]
> > version 0.4 that is still left in place.
>
> is there a reason to keep 0.4 usually its better to maintain one recipe
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
> > MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

I can send a patch to remove 0.4 as well. Wanted to wait until the two
easier patches were in before stacking another one up behind them.

Chris

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Khem Raj]

On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can send a patch to remove 0.4 as well. Wanted to wait until the two
> easier patches were in before stacking another one up behind them.

this all could be just 1 patch

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] dfu-util cleanup

[Chris Morgan]

On Jun 1, 2014 1:03 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Chris Morgan <chmorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I can send a patch to remove 0.4 as well. Wanted to wait until the two
> > easier patches were in before stacking another one up behind them.
>
> this all could be just 1 patch
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Let me resubmit in a few minutes.

Chris