All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm,console: circular dependency between console_sem and zone lock
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:08:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538B33D5.8070002@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140512162811.GD3685@quack.suse.cz>

On 05/12/2014 12:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 07-05-14 22:03:08, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > 
>> > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest -next
>> > kernel I've stumbled on the following spew:
>   Thanks for report. So the problem seems to be maginally valid but I'm not
> 100% sure whom to blame :). So printk() code calls up() which calls
> try_to_wake_up() under console_sem.lock spinlock. That function can take
> rq->lock which is all expected.
> 
> The next part of the chain is that during CPU initialization we call
> __sched_fork() with rq->lock which calls into hrtimer_init() which can
> allocate memory which creates a dependency rq->lock => zone.lock.rlock.
> 
> And memory management code calls printk() which zone.lock.rlock held which
> closes the loop. Now I suspect the second link in the chain can happen only
> while CPU is booting and might even happen only if some debug options are
> enabled. But I don't really know scheduler code well enough. Steven?

I've cc'ed Peter and Ingo who may be able to answer that, as it still happens
on -next.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm,console: circular dependency between console_sem and zone lock
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:08:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538B33D5.8070002@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140512162811.GD3685@quack.suse.cz>

On 05/12/2014 12:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 07-05-14 22:03:08, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > 
>> > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest -next
>> > kernel I've stumbled on the following spew:
>   Thanks for report. So the problem seems to be maginally valid but I'm not
> 100% sure whom to blame :). So printk() code calls up() which calls
> try_to_wake_up() under console_sem.lock spinlock. That function can take
> rq->lock which is all expected.
> 
> The next part of the chain is that during CPU initialization we call
> __sched_fork() with rq->lock which calls into hrtimer_init() which can
> allocate memory which creates a dependency rq->lock => zone.lock.rlock.
> 
> And memory management code calls printk() which zone.lock.rlock held which
> closes the loop. Now I suspect the second link in the chain can happen only
> while CPU is booting and might even happen only if some debug options are
> enabled. But I don't really know scheduler code well enough. Steven?

I've cc'ed Peter and Ingo who may be able to answer that, as it still happens
on -next.


Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-01 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-08  2:03 mm,console: circular dependency between console_sem and zone lock Sasha Levin
2014-05-08  2:03 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-12 16:28 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-12 16:28   ` Jan Kara
2014-06-01 14:08   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-06-01 14:08     ` Sasha Levin
2014-06-03  1:55     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-03  1:55       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-03  8:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03  9:00     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538B33D5.8070002@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.