From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538C76A4.8050508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Hi,
On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR and EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG macros
> by exynos_boot_vector_addr() and exynos_boot_vector_flag() static
> inlines.
>
> This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index 87c0d34..cf09383 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -166,12 +166,23 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster)
> S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN);
> }
>
> -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
> - S5P_INFORM7 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
> - (sysram_base_addr + 0x24) : S5P_INFORM0))
> -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
> - S5P_INFORM6 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
> - (sysram_base_addr + 0x20) : S5P_INFORM1))
> +static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
> +{
> + if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> + return S5P_INFORM7;
> + else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0)
> + return sysram_base_addr + 0x24;
> + return S5P_INFORM0;
I know this is not strictly related to this patch, but isn't a check
whether the SoC is Exynos4210 also needed, before comparing the revision
with Exynos4210-specific values?
Otherwise looks good.
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538C76A4.8050508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Hi,
On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR and EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG macros
> by exynos_boot_vector_addr() and exynos_boot_vector_flag() static
> inlines.
>
> This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index 87c0d34..cf09383 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -166,12 +166,23 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster)
> S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN);
> }
>
> -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
> - S5P_INFORM7 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
> - (sysram_base_addr + 0x24) : S5P_INFORM0))
> -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \
> - S5P_INFORM6 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \
> - (sysram_base_addr + 0x20) : S5P_INFORM1))
> +static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
> +{
> + if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> + return S5P_INFORM7;
> + else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0)
> + return sysram_base_addr + 0x24;
> + return S5P_INFORM0;
I know this is not strictly related to this patch, but isn't a check
whether the SoC is Exynos4210 also needed, before comparing the revision
with Exynos4210-specific values?
Otherwise looks good.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-02 12:35 [PATCH v2 0/7] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: fix AFTR mode on boards with secure firmware enabled Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm: firmware: Check firmware is running or not Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:51 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:51 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: EXYNOS: add support for firmware-assisted c15resume Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ARM: EXYNOS: add AFTR mode support to firmware do_idle method Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:01 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:01 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:05 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-06-02 13:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 16:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-02 16:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: use c15resume firmware method if secure firmware is enabled Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup on EXYNOS4x12 for AFTR mode code Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 13:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 13:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-06-02 16:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-02 16:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538C76A4.8050508@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.