From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config option
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:11:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538E0FC3.8050904@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK5sBcEbLetRcgPuDJ30RqYjLOHhCXChtKE5ep22ZvEPWc9XwA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/02/14 23:13, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> @@ -831,7 +817,6 @@ config ARCH_S5PV210
>>
>> config ARCH_EXYNOS
>> bool "Samsung EXYNOS"
>> - select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
>> select ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL
>> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>> select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> I think this patch is not based on the latest code base as ARCH_EXYNOS
> symbol is now defined in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig file.
Hm.. yes. It was based on linux-next from the middle of May. I'll
regenerate it now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config option
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:11:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538E0FC3.8050904@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK5sBcEbLetRcgPuDJ30RqYjLOHhCXChtKE5ep22ZvEPWc9XwA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/02/14 23:13, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> @@ -831,7 +817,6 @@ config ARCH_S5PV210
>>
>> config ARCH_EXYNOS
>> bool "Samsung EXYNOS"
>> - select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
>> select ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL
>> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>> select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> I think this patch is not based on the latest code base as ARCH_EXYNOS
> symbol is now defined in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig file.
Hm.. yes. It was based on linux-next from the middle of May. I'll
regenerate it now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-02 22:07 [PATCH] ARM: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config option Stephen Boyd
2014-06-02 22:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-06-03 4:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 4:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-06-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-06-03 6:13 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-06-03 6:13 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-06-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-06-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538E0FC3.8050904@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.