From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
To: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>, <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: make ecc parameters same as definition
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:30:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53958CCE.5080307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402041728-12056-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
Hi, Bo
Thanks for the patch.
On 6/6/2014 4:02 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> If the ecc parameter is not the same as definition, when the
> mtd core check these parameters, it will give the unexpected
> result.
Could you be more specific to tell what kind of result will happened?
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 4ce181a..4f5348f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -861,12 +861,11 @@ static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf,
> {
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
> - int i, err_nbr, eccbytes;
> + int i, err_nbr;
> uint8_t *buf_pos;
> int total_err = 0;
>
> - eccbytes = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
> - for (i = 0; i < eccbytes; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nand_chip->ecc.total; i++)
> if (ecc[i] != 0xff)
> goto normal_check;
> /* Erased page, return OK */
> @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
> - int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> + int eccsize = chip->ecc.size * chip->ecc.steps;
> uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
> uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
> uint32_t stat;
> @@ -1169,8 +1168,7 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - /* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */
> - nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize;
> + nand_chip->ecc.size = sector_size;
>
> /* set ECC page size and oob layout */
> switch (mtd->writesize) {
> @@ -1185,18 +1183,20 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base +
> host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset;
>
> - nand_chip->ecc.steps = 1;
> + nand_chip->ecc.steps = host->pmecc_sector_number;
> nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap;
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> + nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector;
> + nand_chip->ecc.total = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> host->pmecc_sector_number;
> - if (nand_chip->ecc.bytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> + if (nand_chip->ecc.total > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n");
> err_no = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> }
> pmecc_config_ecc_layout(&atmel_pmecc_oobinfo,
> mtd->oobsize,
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes);
> + nand_chip->ecc.total);
> +
> nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_pmecc_oobinfo;
> break;
> case 512:
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: josh.wu@atmel.com (Josh Wu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: make ecc parameters same as definition
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:30:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53958CCE.5080307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402041728-12056-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
Hi, Bo
Thanks for the patch.
On 6/6/2014 4:02 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> If the ecc parameter is not the same as definition, when the
> mtd core check these parameters, it will give the unexpected
> result.
Could you be more specific to tell what kind of result will happened?
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 4ce181a..4f5348f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -861,12 +861,11 @@ static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf,
> {
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
> - int i, err_nbr, eccbytes;
> + int i, err_nbr;
> uint8_t *buf_pos;
> int total_err = 0;
>
> - eccbytes = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
> - for (i = 0; i < eccbytes; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nand_chip->ecc.total; i++)
> if (ecc[i] != 0xff)
> goto normal_check;
> /* Erased page, return OK */
> @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
> - int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> + int eccsize = chip->ecc.size * chip->ecc.steps;
> uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
> uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
> uint32_t stat;
> @@ -1169,8 +1168,7 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - /* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */
> - nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize;
> + nand_chip->ecc.size = sector_size;
>
> /* set ECC page size and oob layout */
> switch (mtd->writesize) {
> @@ -1185,18 +1183,20 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base +
> host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset;
>
> - nand_chip->ecc.steps = 1;
> + nand_chip->ecc.steps = host->pmecc_sector_number;
> nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap;
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> + nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector;
> + nand_chip->ecc.total = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> host->pmecc_sector_number;
> - if (nand_chip->ecc.bytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> + if (nand_chip->ecc.total > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n");
> err_no = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> }
> pmecc_config_ecc_layout(&atmel_pmecc_oobinfo,
> mtd->oobsize,
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes);
> + nand_chip->ecc.total);
> +
> nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_pmecc_oobinfo;
> break;
> case 512:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 8:02 [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: make ecc parameters same as definition Bo Shen
2014-06-06 8:02 ` Bo Shen
2014-06-09 10:30 ` Josh Wu [this message]
2014-06-09 10:30 ` Josh Wu
2014-06-11 3:24 ` Bo Shen
2014-06-11 3:24 ` Bo Shen
2014-06-12 7:20 ` Josh Wu
2014-06-12 7:20 ` Josh Wu
2014-06-12 7:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-06-12 7:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-06-12 7:45 ` Bo Shen
2014-06-12 7:45 ` Bo Shen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53958CCE.5080307@atmel.com \
--to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=voice.shen@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.