[Printing-architecture] "no-color-management" not a good idea for a name of a boolean CUPS option

[Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I have encountered a problem with the "no-color-management" and
cupsGetOption() not be able to recognize that the user has supplied "-o
no-color-management" on the command line.

If you have an arbitrary boolean option in CUPS filters or backends,
like "xxx" the variants

   -o xxx
   -o xxx=1
   -o xxx=on
   -o xxx=yes
   -o xxx=true

are supposed to let it be interpreted as set and

   -o noxxx
   -o xxx=0
   -o xxx=off
   -o xxx=no
   -o xxx=false

let it be interpreted as not set. To support the "-o noxxx" case
cupsGetOption() seems to split a "no" in the beginning of the name off
if there is no '='. Therefore "no-color-management=" works but
"no-color-management" not. The latter is probably interpreted as
"-color-management=false".

Mike, am I right with this?

So I suggest something like "calibration-mode", "cm-calibration-mode",
"cm-calibration", or similar.

WDYT?

   Till