From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: "Nuno Magalhães" <nunomagalhaes@eu.ipp.pt>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID newbie, 1 vs 5, chunk sizes
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:50:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A09BFF.4030901@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADqA9uYH0g2wNghmGPCLWcSq-E8bD43Rx_gSiN68rTUHibwX_w@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/17/2014 4:09 AM, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
...
> The question remains: what are the implications of having 7200 drives
> and 5400 drives in a RAID1, 10 or 5? It'll be as slow as the slowest
> drive, correct? What about any syncing issues during a power outage?
You already know these answers. At this point in the thread you're
seeking hand holding, not knowledge acquisition, or you simply like to
chat. This list is not intended to be that type of resource. That's
what web forums are for.
> Any takes on the Hitachis?
There are hundreds of drive models suitable for RAID use. Each
manufacturer clearly identifies in their documentation which of their
drives fit the bill. There really is no reason you should need to ask
on this list if drives from a particular manufacturer are suitable. If
you're seeking consumer drives with ERC/TLER due to cost reasons, that's
not a technical issue, but a dollars issue, and not on topic here.
We understand this is your first RAID system, but at some point you have
to remove the training wheels from your bike.
Cheers,
Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-14 21:01 RAID newbie, 1 vs 5, chunk sizes Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-14 21:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-06-15 11:50 ` Nuno Magalhães
[not found] ` <pmrj5x4rq3qbl6unnu7guho9.1402849407134@email.android.com>
2014-06-15 17:40 ` Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-16 2:23 ` Phil Turmel
2014-06-16 12:36 ` Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-16 13:19 ` Mark Knecht
2014-06-16 14:28 ` Phil Turmel
2014-06-16 16:14 ` Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-16 20:13 ` Phil Turmel
2014-06-16 21:02 ` Mark Knecht
2014-06-17 0:41 ` Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-17 0:47 ` Brad Campbell
2014-06-17 9:09 ` Nuno Magalhães
2014-06-17 19:50 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2014-06-18 2:55 ` Brad Campbell
2014-06-18 7:33 ` Wilson, Jonathan
2014-06-18 10:19 ` Dag Nygren
2014-06-18 11:58 ` Mathias Burén
2014-06-18 12:16 ` Brad Campbell
2014-06-18 17:34 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-06-19 6:45 ` Wilson, Jonathan
2014-06-29 13:22 ` Nuno Magalhães
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A09BFF.4030901@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nunomagalhaes@eu.ipp.pt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.