From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"'bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com'" <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "wg@grandegger.com" <wg@grandegger.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: can: Remodel FlexCAN register read/write APIs for BE instances
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:34:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AAA5AC.5070707@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D17264BA8@AcuExch.aculab.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1015 bytes --]
On 06/25/2014 12:29 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> Ok. Or should I create two functions for read and write - one does it in LE way and the other
>> in BE way and parse the DT to understand which endianness the module supports.
>
> An indirect call is likely to be slower than a conditional.
> The conditional inside a non-inlined function is likely to get
> predicted correctly on any code paths that matter.
> Unfortunately using a real function increases register pressure.
>
> Maybe a compile-time option for BE, LE or both.
> So a 'generic' kernel can work, but a SoC specific one will be faster.
> Then have the driver load/attach/init fail if it is the wrong endianness.
Don't overengineer, CAN is max 1 MiB/s.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 242 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 15:54 [PATCH] net: can: Remodel FlexCAN register read/write APIs for BE instances Bhupesh Sharma
2014-06-24 15:54 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2014-06-25 8:27 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-25 9:41 ` bhupesh.sharma
2014-06-25 10:26 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-25 11:01 ` bhupesh.sharma
2014-06-25 11:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-25 14:16 ` bhupesh.sharma
2014-06-25 19:00 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-26 9:28 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-26 9:30 ` bhupesh.sharma
2014-06-26 9:35 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-06-25 10:29 ` David Laight
2014-06-25 10:34 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2014-06-25 8:58 ` David Laight
2014-06-25 9:55 ` bhupesh.sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53AAA5AC.5070707@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.