* [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite
@ 2014-06-24 12:51 Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-24 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Reproducer 1:
modprobe -r btrfs; modprobe btrfs
while true ; do mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde > /dev/null 2>&1; done
CTLR-C
we keep stale FSIDs.
btrfs-devlist | egrep "/dev/sde" | wc -l
41
Reproducer 2:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sdf
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdf
btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
echo $?
0 <-- wrong
fix this at device_list_add() to check and delete if the newly added disk path
is already in the device list
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b107ad8..91ba2cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -598,6 +598,40 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
run_scheduled_bios(device);
}
+static void find_delete_duplicate_dev(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_fs_devs;
+ struct btrfs_device *dev;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
+
+ if (new_dev->fs_devices == fs_devs || fs_devs->opened)
+ continue;
+
+ cur_fs_devs = fs_devs;
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, &cur_fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
+
+ if (dev->name && !strcmp(new_dev->name->str,
+ dev->name->str)) {
+ if (cur_fs_devs->num_devices == 1) {
+ free_fs_devices(cur_fs_devs);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
+ list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_list);
+ cur_fs_devs->num_devices--;
+ if (dev->missing)
+ cur_fs_devs->missing_devices--;
+ mutex_unlock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
+ rcu_string_free(dev->name);
+ kfree(dev);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
@@ -708,6 +742,13 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
fs_devices->latest_devid = devid;
fs_devices->latest_trans = found_transid;
}
+
+ /*
+ * if new fs is created on the same path we need to clean
+ * the old one.
+ */
+ find_delete_duplicate_dev(device);
+
*fs_devices_ret = fs_devices;
return 0;
}
--
2.0.0.257.g75cc6c6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
@ 2014-06-24 12:51 ` Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-24 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -f -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdd
modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
mount -o degraded /dev/sdd /btrfs <-- calls add_missing_dev() to add missing btrfs_device
umount /btrfs
btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
echo $?
0
mount /dev/sdd /btrfs
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdd,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
fix this by checking if the device name is present in the BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY
ioctl
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index b9efe58..74ef9bf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1857,6 +1857,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
int ret = -ENOTTY;
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
+ struct btrfs_device *dev;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
@@ -1882,6 +1883,14 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
kfree(vol);
if (ret)
break;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
+ if (dev->name)
+ continue;
+
+ return !0;
+ }
+
ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSLIST:
--
2.0.0.257.g75cc6c6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
@ 2014-06-30 8:31 ` Anand Jain
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-06-30 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
NACK for this. I have null pointer deference with this patch.
extremely sorry. I am investigating..
Anand
On 24/06/2014 20:51, Anand Jain wrote:
> Reproducer 1:
> modprobe -r btrfs; modprobe btrfs
>
> while true ; do mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde > /dev/null 2>&1; done
> CTLR-C
> we keep stale FSIDs.
>
> btrfs-devlist | egrep "/dev/sde" | wc -l
> 41
>
> Reproducer 2:
> mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sdf
> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdf
> btrfs dev ready /dev/sdd
> echo $?
> 0 <-- wrong
>
> fix this at device_list_add() to check and delete if the newly added disk path
> is already in the device list
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index b107ad8..91ba2cf 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,40 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
> run_scheduled_bios(device);
> }
>
> +static void find_delete_duplicate_dev(struct btrfs_device *new_dev)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs;
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_fs_devs;
> + struct btrfs_device *dev;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
> +
> + if (new_dev->fs_devices == fs_devs || fs_devs->opened)
> + continue;
> +
> + cur_fs_devs = fs_devs;
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &cur_fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
> +
> + if (dev->name && !strcmp(new_dev->name->str,
> + dev->name->str)) {
> + if (cur_fs_devs->num_devices == 1) {
> + free_fs_devices(cur_fs_devs);
> + } else {
> + mutex_lock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
> + list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_list);
> + cur_fs_devs->num_devices--;
> + if (dev->missing)
> + cur_fs_devs->missing_devices--;
> + mutex_unlock(&cur_fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
> + rcu_string_free(dev->name);
> + kfree(dev);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
> u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
> @@ -708,6 +742,13 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,
> fs_devices->latest_devid = devid;
> fs_devices->latest_trans = found_transid;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * if new fs is created on the same path we need to clean
> + * the old one.
> + */
> + find_delete_duplicate_dev(device);
> +
> *fs_devices_ret = fs_devices;
> return 0;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-30 8:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-24 12:51 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
2014-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: we are not yet ready if device is missing Anand Jain
2014-06-30 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: device list could grow infinite Anand Jain
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.