From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
vikas.sajjan@samsung.com, joshi@samsung.com, naushad@samsung.com,
thomas.ab@samsung.com, chow.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B18C46.9010405@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403705032-14835-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Hi Pankaj,
In general the patch seems quite nice, but please see few comments inline.
On 25.06.2014 16:03, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Add support for mapping Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU)
> base address from device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
[snip]
> +static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = NULL;
nit: Unnecessary variable initialization.
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> +
nit: Unnecessary blank line.
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_err("Failed to find PMU node\n");
> + return;
Returning here probably doesn't make too much sense, especially when you
just panic if the mapping fails and you remove the static mapping in
patch 2/5, so backwards compatibility isn't provided anyway.
So something like this might be a better idea:
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
if (np)
pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!pmu_base_addr)
panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> + }
> +
> + pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> + if (!pmu_base_addr)
> + panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void __init exynos_init_time(void)
> +{
> + /* Nothing to do timer specific.
> + * Since platsmp.c needs pmu base address by the time
> + * DT is not unflatten so we can't use DT APIs before
> + * init_time
> + */
> + exynos_map_pmu();
Would moving this to .init_irq() callback work too? There are more
things happening in .init_time() so it seems more fragile and some
platforms (e.g. mach-tegra) do such platform-specific initialization in
.init_irq() instead.
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B18C46.9010405@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403705032-14835-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Hi Pankaj,
In general the patch seems quite nice, but please see few comments inline.
On 25.06.2014 16:03, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Add support for mapping Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU)
> base address from device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
[snip]
> +static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = NULL;
nit: Unnecessary variable initialization.
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> +
nit: Unnecessary blank line.
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_err("Failed to find PMU node\n");
> + return;
Returning here probably doesn't make too much sense, especially when you
just panic if the mapping fails and you remove the static mapping in
patch 2/5, so backwards compatibility isn't provided anyway.
So something like this might be a better idea:
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
if (np)
pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!pmu_base_addr)
panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> + }
> +
> + pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> + if (!pmu_base_addr)
> + panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void __init exynos_init_time(void)
> +{
> + /* Nothing to do timer specific.
> + * Since platsmp.c needs pmu base address by the time
> + * DT is not unflatten so we can't use DT APIs before
> + * init_time
> + */
> + exynos_map_pmu();
Would moving this to .init_irq() callback work too? There are more
things happening in .init_time() so it seems more fragile and some
platforms (e.g. mach-tegra) do such platform-specific initialization in
.init_irq() instead.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 14:03 [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-30 16:11 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-06-30 16:11 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-05 6:31 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-05 6:31 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Refactored code for using PMU " Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-30 16:19 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 16:19 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-05 6:34 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-05 6:34 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Move "mach/map.h" inclusion from regs-pmu.h to platsmp.c Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-30 16:20 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 16:20 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-05 6:35 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-05 6:35 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-30 17:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 17:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-05 7:09 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-05 7:09 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-08 14:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-08 14:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-25 14:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Move PMU specific definitions from common.h Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-25 14:03 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-30 17:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 17:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-05 7:10 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-05 7:10 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-06-26 11:30 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Vikas Sajjan
2014-06-26 11:30 ` Vikas Sajjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B18C46.9010405@samsung.com \
--to=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=chow.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=joshi@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=naushad@samsung.com \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=vikas.sajjan@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.