All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn-UYDU3/A3LUY@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 03/15] hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:28:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B592CE.2010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbYtJ7TGqvjG3VAPPD5tVXx9-jEJU3iKEStUMxOvD1v=LQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

Hi Ohad,

On 07/03/2014 02:00 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Suman,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure we need this patch.
>>
>> This patch is needed if we use the controller-phandle + args specifier
>> for requesting hwlocks by a client, as we need to translate
>> controller-phandle to the corresponding hwspinlock_device.
>>
>> Looks like we still don't have a closure on the semantics of how
>> clients have to request a lock in DT. You are suggesting something like
>>     hwlocks = <global_lock1 global_lock2 ...>;
>>
>> whereas this patch is built to support based on comments from
>> DT-maintainers,
>>     hwlocks = <controller-phandle lock-specifier1>, <controller-phandle
>> lock-specifier2>...;
> 
> I'm actually ok with this suggestion and haven't suggested otherwise.

OK, thanks for confirming and sorry for the misinterpretation.

> 
> All I propose is that we add the base_id property to the controller
> node (as you have done in the subsequent patches), and then drivers
> will be able to infer the global lock id from the DT data by adding
> the controller's base_id to the lock specifier.

OK, but we would still require this function to lookup the registered
device from the controller-phandle to retrieve the base_id. Do note that
the hwspinlock core currently only maintains the registered locks in an
integrated radix tree, but not the registered hwspinlock banks themselves.

regards
Suman

> Controllers with non standard lock indexing may use an xlate() method
> if needed but frankly this is fictional right now. We can start
> without this, and add it later when needed, as this doesn't affect the
> DT data.
> 
> With the global lock id in hand, drivers could simply use the existing
> hwspin_lock_request_specific API to obtain a specific lock, and then
> we don't need this patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ohad.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 03/15] hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:28:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B592CE.2010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbYtJ7TGqvjG3VAPPD5tVXx9-jEJU3iKEStUMxOvD1v=LQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ohad,

On 07/03/2014 02:00 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Suman,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure we need this patch.
>>
>> This patch is needed if we use the controller-phandle + args specifier
>> for requesting hwlocks by a client, as we need to translate
>> controller-phandle to the corresponding hwspinlock_device.
>>
>> Looks like we still don't have a closure on the semantics of how
>> clients have to request a lock in DT. You are suggesting something like
>>     hwlocks = <global_lock1 global_lock2 ...>;
>>
>> whereas this patch is built to support based on comments from
>> DT-maintainers,
>>     hwlocks = <controller-phandle lock-specifier1>, <controller-phandle
>> lock-specifier2>...;
> 
> I'm actually ok with this suggestion and haven't suggested otherwise.

OK, thanks for confirming and sorry for the misinterpretation.

> 
> All I propose is that we add the base_id property to the controller
> node (as you have done in the subsequent patches), and then drivers
> will be able to infer the global lock id from the DT data by adding
> the controller's base_id to the lock specifier.

OK, but we would still require this function to lookup the registered
device from the controller-phandle to retrieve the base_id. Do note that
the hwspinlock core currently only maintains the registered locks in an
integrated radix tree, but not the registered hwspinlock banks themselves.

regards
Suman

> Controllers with non standard lock indexing may use an xlate() method
> if needed but frankly this is fictional right now. We can start
> without this, and add it later when needed, as this doesn't affect the
> DT data.
> 
> With the global lock id in hand, drivers could simply use the existing
> hwspin_lock_request_specific API to obtain a specific lock, and then
> we don't need this patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ohad.
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 03/15] hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:28:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B592CE.2010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbYtJ7TGqvjG3VAPPD5tVXx9-jEJU3iKEStUMxOvD1v=LQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ohad,

On 07/03/2014 02:00 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Suman,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure we need this patch.
>>
>> This patch is needed if we use the controller-phandle + args specifier
>> for requesting hwlocks by a client, as we need to translate
>> controller-phandle to the corresponding hwspinlock_device.
>>
>> Looks like we still don't have a closure on the semantics of how
>> clients have to request a lock in DT. You are suggesting something like
>>     hwlocks = <global_lock1 global_lock2 ...>;
>>
>> whereas this patch is built to support based on comments from
>> DT-maintainers,
>>     hwlocks = <controller-phandle lock-specifier1>, <controller-phandle
>> lock-specifier2>...;
> 
> I'm actually ok with this suggestion and haven't suggested otherwise.

OK, thanks for confirming and sorry for the misinterpretation.

> 
> All I propose is that we add the base_id property to the controller
> node (as you have done in the subsequent patches), and then drivers
> will be able to infer the global lock id from the DT data by adding
> the controller's base_id to the lock specifier.

OK, but we would still require this function to lookup the registered
device from the controller-phandle to retrieve the base_id. Do note that
the hwspinlock core currently only maintains the registered locks in an
integrated radix tree, but not the registered hwspinlock banks themselves.

regards
Suman

> Controllers with non standard lock indexing may use an xlate() method
> if needed but frankly this is fictional right now. We can start
> without this, and add it later when needed, as this doesn't affect the
> DT data.
> 
> With the global lock id in hand, drivers could simply use the existing
> hwspin_lock_request_specific API to obtain a specific lock, and then
> we don't need this patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ohad.
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-03 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-01  0:34 [PATCHv5 00/15] hwspinlock/omap dt support Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` Suman Anna
     [not found] ` <1398904476-26200-1-git-send-email-s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-01  0:34   ` [PATCHv5 01/15] Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34     ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34     ` Suman Anna
2014-05-02 14:58     ` Rob Herring
2014-05-02 14:58       ` Rob Herring
2014-05-02 22:46       ` Suman Anna
2014-05-02 22:46         ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 02/15] Documentation: dt: add the omap hwspinlock bindings document Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 03/15] hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-01 12:26   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:26     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]     ` <CAK=WgbakGbTaYz+4K24aT3vyRkDYwPKCm6XrcJvH667NMMfTTA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-02 21:14       ` Suman Anna
2014-07-02 21:14         ` Suman Anna
2014-07-02 21:14         ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03  7:00         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-03  7:00           ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]           ` <CAK=WgbYtJ7TGqvjG3VAPPD5tVXx9-jEJU3iKEStUMxOvD1v=LQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-03 17:28             ` Suman Anna [this message]
2014-07-03 17:28               ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03 17:28               ` Suman Anna
2014-07-04  5:01               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-04  5:01                 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]                 ` <CAK=WgbaahqdmWRDMKtRhco4y5B-WBFYDHYs2cLM7NL=QhnhK2Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-08 15:22                   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-08 15:22                     ` Suman Anna
2014-07-08 15:22                     ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 04/15] hwspinlock/core: add common OF helpers Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-01 12:45   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:45     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-02 21:14     ` Suman Anna
2014-07-02 21:14       ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03  7:15       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-03  7:15         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]         ` <CAK=WgbbJ6a17wrsEcvNq6tPiaciQ=E+22QE06t9EA8RFqicNRg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-03 17:35           ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03 17:35             ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03 17:35             ` Suman Anna
2014-07-04  4:58             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-04  4:58               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]               ` <CAK=WgbbZYwfOyeZuDTX2RXtEdYzsZc++crHZ-ZAqeiWds0BCcg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-08 15:37                 ` Suman Anna
2014-07-08 15:37                   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-08 15:37                   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 05/15] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-01 12:48   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:48     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-02 19:42     ` Suman Anna
2014-07-02 19:42       ` Suman Anna
2014-07-03  7:25       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-03  7:25         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 06/15] hwspinlock/omap: enable module before reading SYSSTATUS register Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-07-01 12:51   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:51     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-02 19:38     ` Suman Anna
2014-07-02 19:38       ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 07/15] hwspinlock/omap: enable build for AM33xx, AM43xx & DRA7xx Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
     [not found]   ` <1398904476-26200-8-git-send-email-s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-01 12:53     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:53       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-07-01 12:53       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 08/15] hwspinlock/core: add support for base id in DT Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
     [not found]   ` <1398904476-26200-9-git-send-email-s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 20:37     ` Rob Herring
2014-05-05 20:37       ` Rob Herring
2014-05-05 20:37       ` Rob Herring
     [not found]       ` <CAL_JsqJW1pqUjQ3DQrppO5n=MmpFOhCyU2zkSzA9s9TpYbq3CA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 21:37         ` Suman Anna
2014-05-05 21:37           ` Suman Anna
2014-05-05 21:37           ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 09/15] hwspinlock/core: prepare unregister code to support reserved locks Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 10/15] hwspinlock/core: prepare core " Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 11/15] hwspinlock/core: add support for " Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 12/15] hwspinlock/core: add OF helper to parse " Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-05 21:44   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-05 21:44     ` Suman Anna
2014-05-05 21:44     ` Suman Anna
     [not found]     ` <53680639.1080405-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 21:54       ` Josh Cartwright
2014-05-05 21:54         ` Josh Cartwright
2014-05-05 21:54         ` Josh Cartwright
2014-05-10  1:17         ` Suman Anna
2014-05-10  1:17           ` Suman Anna
2014-05-10  1:17           ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 13/15] hwspinlock/omap: use OF helper to get " Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 14/15] hwspinlock/core: return ERR_PTRs on failure in _request_ api Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34 ` [PATCHv5 RFC 15/15] hwspinlock/core: change return codes of_hwspin_lock_request_specific Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna
2014-05-01  0:34   ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53B592CE.2010001@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bjorn-UYDU3/A3LUY@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.