From: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
"xen.org" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 28813: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 07:58:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B6B2F1.6040401@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404471333.14796.17.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 11:35 +0100, xen.org wrote:
>
>> flight 28813 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-i386-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 27467
>> build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 27467
>> build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 27467
>>
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log shows:
>
> CC libxl/libvirt_driver_libxl_impl_la-libxl_driver.lo
> libxl/libxl_domain.c: In function 'libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities':
> libxl/libxl_domain.c:1032:9: error: too few arguments to function 'libxl_set_vcpuaffinity'
> In file included from libxl/libxl_domain.h:27:0,
> from libxl/libxl_domain.c:28:
> /home/osstest/build.28813.build-amd64-libvirt/xendist/usr/local/include/libxl.h:1180:5: note: declared here
>
>
> And http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/build-amd64-libvirt/info.html shows:
> revision_libvirt
> b963ca06d4b99e8db71c85b8800aae3c99de6bcb
>
> So I suppose:
> commit 9375ba2a6e0c1dba9e9e6feb1b4a698b64c47085
> Author: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Date: Fri Dec 20 16:01:46 2013 +0100
>
> libxl: correctly handle affinity reset in virDomainPinVcpu[Flags]
>
> wasn't as effective as we had hoped :-(
>
> I suppose the issue is that this patch was only against
> src/libxl/libxl_driver.c and not libxl/libxl_domain.c
>
Dario's patch re-defined the functions, with the intent of not needing
to adjust all call sites
# ifdef LIBXL_HAVE_VCPUINFO_SOFT_AFFINITY
# define libxl_set_vcpuaffinity(ctx, domid, vcpuid, map) \
libxl_set_vcpuaffinity((ctx), (domid), (vcpuid), (map), NULL)
# define libxl_set_vcpuaffinity_all(ctx, domid, max_vcpus, map) \
libxl_set_vcpuaffinity_all((ctx), (domid), (max_vcpus), (map), NULL)
# endif
I'll have to look at this later in the weekend. It is a holiday here
and I'm about to head out the door.
Regards,
Jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 10:35 [xen-unstable test] 28813: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass xen.org
2014-07-04 10:55 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-04 11:21 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-04 11:47 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-04 13:05 ` Ian Jackson
2014-07-04 13:58 ` Jim Fehlig [this message]
2014-07-04 14:00 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B6B2F1.6040401@suse.com \
--to=jfehlig@suse.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.