All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 06/15] drm/armada: move variant initialisation to CRTC init
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:58:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B7E86D.5040109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1X3NMM-0000A5-N5@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 07/05/2014 12:38 PM, Russell King wrote:
> Move the variant initialisation entirely to the CRTC init function -
> the variant support is really about the CRTC properties than the whole
> system, and we want to treat each CRTC individually when we support DT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> index 531a9b0bdcfb..3f0e70bb2e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct armada_crtc {
>  	unsigned		num;
>  	void __iomem		*base;
>  	struct clk		*clk;
> +	struct clk		*extclk[2];

Russell,

I wonder, if we should rename above array srcclk instead of extclk
while moving it anyway. That way we can use it for the other variant
specific clocks, too.

FWIW, I totally agree the it was the right thing to wait for you
to sort out the dependencies. Good work, great patience.

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/15] drm/armada: move variant initialisation to CRTC init
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:58:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B7E86D.5040109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1X3NMM-0000A5-N5@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 07/05/2014 12:38 PM, Russell King wrote:
> Move the variant initialisation entirely to the CRTC init function -
> the variant support is really about the CRTC properties than the whole
> system, and we want to treat each CRTC individually when we support DT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> index 531a9b0bdcfb..3f0e70bb2e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct armada_crtc {
>  	unsigned		num;
>  	void __iomem		*base;
>  	struct clk		*clk;
> +	struct clk		*extclk[2];

Russell,

I wonder, if we should rename above array srcclk instead of extclk
while moving it anyway. That way we can use it for the other variant
specific clocks, too.

FWIW, I totally agree the it was the right thing to wait for you
to sort out the dependencies. Good work, great patience.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-05 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-05 10:37 [PATCH RFC 00/15] Armada DRM updates Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-05 10:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-05 10:37 ` [PATCH RFC 01/15] component: fix missed cleanup in case of devres failure Russell King
2014-07-05 10:37   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 02/15] component: ignore multiple additions of the same component Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 03/15] component: add support for component match array Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 04/15] drm/armada: move IRQ handling into CRTC Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 05/15] drm/armada: use number of CRTCs registered Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 06/15] drm/armada: move variant initialisation to CRTC init Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 11:58   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2014-07-05 11:58     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-07-05 12:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-05 12:21       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-06  9:46       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-07-06  9:46         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-07-09  9:38         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-09  9:38           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-11 14:37     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-11 14:37       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-11 15:18       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-07-11 15:18         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-07-11 15:24         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-11 15:24           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 07/15] drm/armada: make variant a CRTC thing Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 08/15] drm: add of_graph endpoint helper to find possible CRTCs Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 09/15] component: fix bug with legacy API Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 10/15] drm/armada: convert to componentized support Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 11/15] drm/armada: update Armada 510 (Dove) to use "ext_ref_clk1" as the clock Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 12/15] dt-bindings: add Marvell Dove LCD controller documentation Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 13/15] drm/armada: permit CRTCs to be registered as separate devices Russell King
2014-07-05 10:38   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:39 ` [PATCH RFC 14/15] drm/armada: register crtc with port Russell King
2014-07-05 10:39   ` Russell King
2014-07-05 10:39 ` [PATCH RFC 15/15] ARM: dts: dove: add DT LCD controllers Russell King
2014-07-05 10:39   ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53B7E86D.5040109@gmail.com \
    --to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.