All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:10:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BB44FC.7070501@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707141454.3ca1e2fc2e6a4c985d7d2f35@linux-foundation.org>

On 07/07/2014 02:14 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun,  6 Jul 2014 16:38:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
>> Various drivers implement architecture and/or device specific means
>> to restart (reset) the system. Various mechanisms have been implemented
>> to support those schemes. The best known mechanism is arm_pm_restart,
>> which is a function pointer to be set either from platform specific code
>> or from drivers. Another mechanism is to use hardware watchdogs to issue
>> a reset; this mechanism is used if there is no other method available
>> to reset a board or system. Two examples are alim7101_wdt, which currently
>> uses the reboot notifier to trigger a reset, and moxart_wdt, which registers
>> the arm_pm_restart function.
>>
>> The existing mechanisms have a number of drawbacks. Typically only one scheme
>> to restart the system is supported (at least if arm_pm_restart is used).
>> At least in theory there can be mutliple means to restart the system, some of
>> which may be less desirable (for example one mechanism may only reset the CPU,
>> while another may reset the entire system). Using arm_pm_restart can also be
>> racy if the function pointer is set from a driver, as the driver may be in
>> the process of being unloaded when arm_pm_restart is called.
>> Using the reboot notifier is always racy, as it is unknown if and when
>> other functions using the reboot notifier have completed execution
>> by the time the watchdog fires.
>>
>> To solve the problem, introduce a system restart notifier. This notifier
>> is expected to be called from the architecture specific machine_restart()
>> function. Drivers providing system restart functionality (such as the watchdog
>> drivers mentioned above) are expected to register with this notifier.
>
> It all looks sane to my unfamiliar eye.
>
>>   /*
>> + *	Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
>> + *	to restart the system.
>> + */
>
> hm, is this all we have to say?
>
>> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
>> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
>> @@ -104,6 +104,38 @@ int unregister_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_reboot_notifier);
>>
>> +/**
>> + *	register_restart_notifier - Register function to be called to reset
>> + *				    the system
>> + *	@nb: Info about notifier function to be called
>> + *
>> + *	Registers a function with the list of functions
>> + *	to be called to restart the system.
>> + *
>> + *	Currently always returns zero, as blocking_notifier_chain_register()
>> + *	always returns zero.
>> + */
>
> This would be a good place to describe what those notifier callbacks
> actually do.  Why they exist, what their role is, under what
> circumstances they are called, what values they should return, etc.
>

Makes sense. Done.

Guenter



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:10:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BB44FC.7070501@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707141454.3ca1e2fc2e6a4c985d7d2f35@linux-foundation.org>

On 07/07/2014 02:14 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun,  6 Jul 2014 16:38:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
>> Various drivers implement architecture and/or device specific means
>> to restart (reset) the system. Various mechanisms have been implemented
>> to support those schemes. The best known mechanism is arm_pm_restart,
>> which is a function pointer to be set either from platform specific code
>> or from drivers. Another mechanism is to use hardware watchdogs to issue
>> a reset; this mechanism is used if there is no other method available
>> to reset a board or system. Two examples are alim7101_wdt, which currently
>> uses the reboot notifier to trigger a reset, and moxart_wdt, which registers
>> the arm_pm_restart function.
>>
>> The existing mechanisms have a number of drawbacks. Typically only one scheme
>> to restart the system is supported (at least if arm_pm_restart is used).
>> At least in theory there can be mutliple means to restart the system, some of
>> which may be less desirable (for example one mechanism may only reset the CPU,
>> while another may reset the entire system). Using arm_pm_restart can also be
>> racy if the function pointer is set from a driver, as the driver may be in
>> the process of being unloaded when arm_pm_restart is called.
>> Using the reboot notifier is always racy, as it is unknown if and when
>> other functions using the reboot notifier have completed execution
>> by the time the watchdog fires.
>>
>> To solve the problem, introduce a system restart notifier. This notifier
>> is expected to be called from the architecture specific machine_restart()
>> function. Drivers providing system restart functionality (such as the watchdog
>> drivers mentioned above) are expected to register with this notifier.
>
> It all looks sane to my unfamiliar eye.
>
>>   /*
>> + *	Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
>> + *	to restart the system.
>> + */
>
> hm, is this all we have to say?
>
>> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
>> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
>> @@ -104,6 +104,38 @@ int unregister_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_reboot_notifier);
>>
>> +/**
>> + *	register_restart_notifier - Register function to be called to reset
>> + *				    the system
>> + *	@nb: Info about notifier function to be called
>> + *
>> + *	Registers a function with the list of functions
>> + *	to be called to restart the system.
>> + *
>> + *	Currently always returns zero, as blocking_notifier_chain_register()
>> + *	always returns zero.
>> + */
>
> This would be a good place to describe what those notifier callbacks
> actually do.  Why they exist, what their role is, under what
> circumstances they are called, what values they should return, etc.
>

Makes sense. Done.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-06 23:38 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-07 21:14   ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-07 21:14     ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08  1:10     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-07-08  1:10       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: Support restart through " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-07 21:16   ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-07 21:16     ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08  1:12     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-08  1:12       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] power/restart: Call machine_restart instead of arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] watchdog: alim7101: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers Guenter Roeck
2014-07-06 23:38   ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53BB44FC.7070501@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.