From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:07:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBC2F9.4070808@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2058650.s5vKv1ibCp@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2014年07月08日 05:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:24 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>>
>> Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
>> values can not be used in core ACPI code.
>>
>> Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
>> during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
>> on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
>> is not a suitable value for ARM64.
>>
>> What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
>> so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
>> #define acpi_noirq 0 /* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_strict 1 /* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
>> +
>> +static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
> Why this name? In particular, local APIC being present doesn't imply SMP.
Hmm, agreed. How about acpi_has_cpu_in_madt()? As we know,
Local APIC/SAPIC in MADT stands for CPU in the system, how about
the function name above?
>
>> +{
>> + return acpi_lapic;
> Also
>
> return !!acpi_lapic;
>
> would be cleaner IMO.
>
I will update it as you suggested.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:07:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBC2F9.4070808@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2058650.s5vKv1ibCp@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2014?07?08? 05:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:24 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>>
>> Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
>> values can not be used in core ACPI code.
>>
>> Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
>> during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
>> on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
>> is not a suitable value for ARM64.
>>
>> What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
>> so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
>> #define acpi_noirq 0 /* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_strict 1 /* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
>> +
>> +static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
> Why this name? In particular, local APIC being present doesn't imply SMP.
Hmm, agreed. How about acpi_has_cpu_in_madt()? As we know,
Local APIC/SAPIC in MADT stands for CPU in the system, how about
the function name above?
>
>> +{
>> + return acpi_lapic;
> Also
>
> return !!acpi_lapic;
>
> would be cleaner IMO.
>
I will update it as you suggested.
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:07:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBC2F9.4070808@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2058650.s5vKv1ibCp@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2014年07月08日 05:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:24 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>>
>> Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
>> values can not be used in core ACPI code.
>>
>> Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
>> during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
>> on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
>> is not a suitable value for ARM64.
>>
>> What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
>> so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
>> #define acpi_noirq 0 /* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
>> #define acpi_strict 1 /* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
>> +
>> +static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
> Why this name? In particular, local APIC being present doesn't imply SMP.
Hmm, agreed. How about acpi_has_cpu_in_madt()? As we know,
Local APIC/SAPIC in MADT stands for CPU in the system, how about
the function name above?
>
>> +{
>> + return acpi_lapic;
> Also
>
> return !!acpi_lapic;
>
> would be cleaner IMO.
>
I will update it as you suggested.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 8:47 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-07 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 10:07 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-07-08 10:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 10:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-08 9:23 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BBC2F9.4070808@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.