From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:47:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD01A1.2060302@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD0174.4060002@huawei.com>
We're going to have separate user-configured masks and effective ones.
Eventually configured masks can only be changed by writing cpuset.cpus
and cpuset.mems, and they won't be restricted by parent cpuset. While
effective masks reflect cpu/memory hotplug and hierachical restriction,
and these are the real masks that apply to the tasks in the cpuset.
We calculate effective mask this way:
- top cpuset's effective_mask == online_mask, otherwise
- cpuset's effective_mask == configured_mask & parent effective_mask,
if the result is empty, it inherits parent effective mask.
Those behavior changes are for default hierarchy only. For legacy
hierarchy, effective_mask and configured_mask are the same, so we won't
break old interfaces.
To make cs->effective_{cpus,mems} to be effective masks, we need to
- update the effective masks at hotplug
- update the effective masks at config change
- take on ancestor's mask when the effective mask is empty
The second item is done here. We don't need to treat root_cs specially
in update_cpumasks_hier().
This won't introduce behavior change.
v3:
- add a WARN_ON() to check if effective masks are the same with configured
masks on legacy hierarchy.
- pass trialcs->cpus_allowed to update_cpumasks_hier() and add a comment for
it. Similar change for update_nodemasks_hier(). Suggested by Tejun.
v2:
- revise the comment in update_{cpu,node}masks_hier(), suggested by Tejun.
- fix to use @cp instead of @cs in these two functions.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 94f651d..da766c3 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -855,36 +855,45 @@ static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs)
}
/*
- * update_tasks_cpumask_hier - Update the cpumasks of tasks in the hierarchy.
- * @root_cs: the root cpuset of the hierarchy
- * @update_root: update root cpuset or not?
+ * update_cpumasks_hier - Update effective cpumasks and tasks in the subtree
+ * @cs: the cpuset to consider
+ * @new_cpus: temp variable for calculating new effective_cpus
+ *
+ * When congifured cpumask is changed, the effective cpumasks of this cpuset
+ * and all its descendants need to be updated.
*
- * This will update cpumasks of tasks in @root_cs and all other empty cpusets
- * which take on cpumask of @root_cs.
+ * On legacy hierachy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed.
*
* Called with cpuset_mutex held
*/
-static void update_tasks_cpumask_hier(struct cpuset *root_cs, bool update_root)
+static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
{
struct cpuset *cp;
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
rcu_read_lock();
- cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, root_cs) {
- if (cp == root_cs) {
- if (!update_root)
- continue;
- } else {
- /* skip the whole subtree if @cp have some CPU */
- if (!cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed)) {
- pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
- continue;
- }
+ cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
+ struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
+
+ cpumask_and(new_cpus, cp->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
+
+ /* Skip the whole subtree if the cpumask remains the same. */
+ if (cpumask_equal(new_cpus, cp->effective_cpus)) {
+ pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
+ continue;
}
+
if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpumask_copy(cp->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
+ mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+ WARN_ON(!cgroup_on_dfl(cp->css.cgroup) &&
+ !cpumask_equal(cp->cpus_allowed, cp->effective_cpus));
+
update_tasks_cpumask(cp);
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -940,7 +949,8 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- update_tasks_cpumask_hier(cs, true);
+ /* use trialcs->cpus_allowed as a temp variable */
+ update_cpumasks_hier(cs, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
if (is_load_balanced)
rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
@@ -1091,36 +1101,45 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
}
/*
- * update_tasks_nodemask_hier - Update the nodemasks of tasks in the hierarchy.
- * @cs: the root cpuset of the hierarchy
- * @update_root: update the root cpuset or not?
+ * update_nodemasks_hier - Update effective nodemasks and tasks in the subtree
+ * @cs: the cpuset to consider
+ * @new_mems: a temp variable for calculating new effective_mems
+ *
+ * When configured nodemask is changed, the effective nodemasks of this cpuset
+ * and all its descendants need to be updated.
*
- * This will update nodemasks of tasks in @root_cs and all other empty cpusets
- * which take on nodemask of @root_cs.
+ * On legacy hiearchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
*
* Called with cpuset_mutex held
*/
-static void update_tasks_nodemask_hier(struct cpuset *root_cs, bool update_root)
+static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
{
struct cpuset *cp;
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
rcu_read_lock();
- cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, root_cs) {
- if (cp == root_cs) {
- if (!update_root)
- continue;
- } else {
- /* skip the whole subtree if @cp have some CPU */
- if (!nodes_empty(cp->mems_allowed)) {
- pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
- continue;
- }
+ cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
+ struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
+
+ nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
+
+ /* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same. */
+ if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
+ pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
+ continue;
}
+
if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cp->effective_mems = *new_mems;
+ mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+ WARN_ON(!cgroup_on_dfl(cp->css.cgroup) &&
+ nodes_equal(cp->mems_allowed, cp->effective_mems));
+
update_tasks_nodemask(cp);
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1188,7 +1207,8 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
cs->mems_allowed = trialcs->mems_allowed;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- update_tasks_nodemask_hier(cs, true);
+ /* use trialcs->mems_allowed as a temp variable */
+ update_nodemasks_hier(cs, &cs->mems_allowed);
done:
return retval;
}
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 8:46 [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
[not found] ` <53BD0187.9060309-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` Li Zefan [this message]
[not found] ` <53BD01A1.2060302-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 19:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Li Zefan
2014-07-09 19:18 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <53BD0174.4060002-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` Li Zefan
2014-07-09 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan
[not found] ` <53BD0215.8060305-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140709201549.GD21090-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD01A1.2060302@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.