All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:47:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD01B6.403@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD0174.4060002@huawei.com>

We're going to have separate user-configured masks and effective ones.

Eventually configured masks can only be changed by writing cpuset.cpus
and cpuset.mems, and they won't be restricted by parent cpuset. While
effective masks reflect cpu/memory hotplug and hierachical restriction,
and these are the real masks that apply to the tasks in the cpuset.

We calculate effective mask this way:
  - top cpuset's effective_mask == online_mask, otherwise
  - cpuset's effective_mask == configured_mask & parent effective_mask,
    if the result is empty, it inherits parent effective mask.

Those behavior changes are for default hierarchy only. For legacy
hierarchy, effective_mask and configured_mask are the same, so we won't
break old interfaces.

We should partition sched domains according to effective_cpus, which
is the real cpulist that takes effects on tasks in the cpuset.

This won't introduce behavior change.

v2:
- Add a comment for the call of rebuild_sched_domains(), suggested
by Tejun.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index f834002..60577cc 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -494,11 +494,11 @@ out:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /*
  * Helper routine for generate_sched_domains().
- * Do cpusets a, b have overlapping cpus_allowed masks?
+ * Do cpusets a, b have overlapping effective cpus_allowed masks?
  */
 static int cpusets_overlap(struct cpuset *a, struct cpuset *b)
 {
-	return cpumask_intersects(a->cpus_allowed, b->cpus_allowed);
+	return cpumask_intersects(a->effective_cpus, b->effective_cpus);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
 			*dattr = SD_ATTR_INIT;
 			update_domain_attr_tree(dattr, &top_cpuset);
 		}
-		cpumask_copy(doms[0], top_cpuset.cpus_allowed);
+		cpumask_copy(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus);
 
 		goto done;
 	}
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ restart:
 			struct cpuset *b = csa[j];
 
 			if (apn == b->pn) {
-				cpumask_or(dp, dp, b->cpus_allowed);
+				cpumask_or(dp, dp, b->effective_cpus);
 				if (dattr)
 					update_domain_attr_tree(dattr + nslot, b);
 
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
 	 * passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains().
 	 * Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains.
 	 */
-	if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
+	if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Generate domain masks and attrs */
@@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
 {
 	struct cpuset *cp;
 	struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
+	bool need_rebuild_sched_domains = false;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
@@ -903,10 +904,21 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
 
 		update_tasks_cpumask(cp);
 
+		/*
+		 * If the effective cpumask of any non-empty cpuset is changed,
+		 * we need to rebuild sched domains.
+		 */
+		if (!cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed) &&
+		    is_sched_load_balance(cp))
+			need_rebuild_sched_domains = true;
+
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		css_put(&cp->css);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	if (need_rebuild_sched_domains)
+		rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -919,7 +931,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
 			  const char *buf)
 {
 	int retval;
-	int is_load_balanced;
 
 	/* top_cpuset.cpus_allowed tracks cpu_online_mask; it's read-only */
 	if (cs == &top_cpuset)
@@ -950,17 +961,12 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
 	if (retval < 0)
 		return retval;
 
-	is_load_balanced = is_sched_load_balance(trialcs);
-
 	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
 	cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
 	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
 
 	/* use trialcs->cpus_allowed as a temp variable */
 	update_cpumasks_hier(cs, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
-
-	if (is_load_balanced)
-		rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.0.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-09  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09  8:46 [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
     [not found]   ` <53BD0187.9060309-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 16:47     ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 16:47       ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09  8:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Li Zefan
     [not found]   ` <53BD01A1.2060302-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 19:57     ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 19:57       ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09  8:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:47 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2014-07-09 19:18   ` [PATCH v3 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Tejun Heo
2014-07-09  8:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan
     [not found]   ` <53BD0215.8060305-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 20:15     ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:15       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]       ` <20140709201549.GD21090-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 20:24         ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:24           ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <53BD0174.4060002-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09  8:48   ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2014-07-09  8:48     ` Li Zefan
2014-07-09 20:12   ` [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:12     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53BD01B6.403@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.