From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:26:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C67D6C.8000803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140716124515.GQ8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/16/2014 08:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:31:49PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> NUM_RCU_NODES is set at build time and is usually a huge number. We calculate the
>> actual number of rcu nodes necessary at boot time based on nr_cpu_ids in
>> rcu_init_geometry() and store it in rcu_num_nodes. We should use this variable
>> instead of NUM_RCU_NODES.
>>
>> This commit changes all such uses of NUM_RCU_NODES to rcu_num_nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> index cedb020..17ccb62 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static bool __read_mostly rcu_nocb_poll; /* Offload kthread are to poll. */
>> static char __initdata nocb_buf[NR_CPUS * 5];
>> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
>>
>> +extern int rcu_num_nodes;
>
> This should not be necessary given the existing declaration in
> kernel/rcu/tree.c way before the #include of kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h.
>
> Or did you get a build failure without this? (And if you did get a build
> failure, I would be really curious how that happened!)
>
> So please send an updated patch or tell me how your build managed to fail.
>
Indeed. The extern was unnecessary. Please find an updated patch below.
--
Pranith
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:21:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES
NUM_RCU_NODES is set at build time and is usually a huge number. We calculate the
actual number of rcu nodes necessary at boot time based on nr_cpu_ids in
rcu_init_geometry() and store it in rcu_num_nodes. We should use this variable
instead of NUM_RCU_NODES.
This commit changes all such uses of NUM_RCU_NODES to rcu_num_nodes.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index cedb020..b99055a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
/* Snapshot current state of ->blkd_tasks lists. */
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rnp);
- if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1)
+ if (rcu_num_nodes > 1)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rcu_get_root(rsp));
put_online_cpus();
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads(void)
BUG_ON(smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&rcu_cpu_thread_spec));
rnp = rcu_get_root(rcu_state_p);
(void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
- if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1) {
+ if (rcu_num_nodes > 1) {
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rcu_state_p, rnp)
(void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 22:31 [PATCH 1/3] rcu: tiny.c: Update reference to tree.c Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Remove stale comment in tree.c Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:53 ` josh
2014-07-15 22:57 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-16 12:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-16 13:29 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-16 23:32 ` josh
2014-07-17 0:55 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-17 1:01 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 1:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-17 1:26 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 2:14 ` Josh Triplett
2014-07-17 2:20 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES Pranith Kumar
2014-07-15 22:54 ` josh
2014-07-16 12:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-16 13:26 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2014-07-15 22:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: tiny.c: Update reference to tree.c josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C67D6C.8000803@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.