From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan.
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:37:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C70CCC.2080109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404898746-6685-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
On 07/09/2014 02:39 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>
> With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to
> scan, add a config option which is selected on x86 and ia64 to do
> the traditional BIOS scanning for tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> index 2f3abcf..c54bd7e 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config IA64
> select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> + select ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP if ACPI
> default y
> help
> The Itanium Processor Family is Intel's 64-bit successor to
This shouldn't actually be set on IA64, should it? IA64 doesn't have
BIOS, either, it has EFI/UEFI, like ARM64...
-hpa
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan.
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:37:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C70CCC.2080109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404898746-6685-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
On 07/09/2014 02:39 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>
> With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to
> scan, add a config option which is selected on x86 and ia64 to do
> the traditional BIOS scanning for tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> index 2f3abcf..c54bd7e 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config IA64
> select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> + select ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP if ACPI
> default y
> help
> The Itanium Processor Family is Intel's 64-bit successor to
This shouldn't actually be set on IA64, should it? IA64 doesn't have
BIOS, either, it has EFI/UEFI, like ARM64...
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 9:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-16 23:37 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-07-16 23:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-16 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-16 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-17 3:18 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-17 3:18 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-17 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-17 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-17 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-18 9:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-18 9:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-09 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-16 23:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 23:28 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:28 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:28 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-16 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-16 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C70CCC.2080109@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.