From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: direct-io: squelch maybe-uninitialized warning in do_direct_IO()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:37:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C79949.7010201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405536124.4357.17.camel@x41>
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
The following warnings:
fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘__blockdev_direct_IO’:
fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
fs/direct-io.c:913:16: note: ‘to’ was declared here
fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘from’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
fs/direct-io.c:913:10: note: ‘from’ was declared here
are false positive because dio_get_page() either fails, or sets both
'from' and 'to'.
Maybe it's better to move initializing "to" and "from" out of
dio_get_page(). That _might_ make it easier for both the the reader and
the compiler to understand what's going on. Something like this:
Christoph Hellwig said ...
The fix of moving the code defintively looks nicer, while I think
uninitialized_var is horrible wart that won't get anywhere near my code.
Boaz Harrosh I agree with Christoph and Paul
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
---
fs/direct-io.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 98040ba..2f024fc 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -198,9 +198,8 @@ static inline int dio_refill_pages(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio)
* L1 cache.
*/
static inline struct page *dio_get_page(struct dio *dio,
- struct dio_submit *sdio, size_t *from, size_t *to)
+ struct dio_submit *sdio)
{
- int n;
if (dio_pages_present(sdio) == 0) {
int ret;
@@ -209,10 +208,7 @@ static inline struct page *dio_get_page(struct dio *dio,
return ERR_PTR(ret);
BUG_ON(dio_pages_present(sdio) == 0);
}
- n = sdio->head++;
- *from = n ? 0 : sdio->from;
- *to = (n == sdio->tail - 1) ? sdio->to : PAGE_SIZE;
- return dio->pages[n];
+ return dio->pages[sdio->head];
}
/**
@@ -911,11 +907,15 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
while (sdio->block_in_file < sdio->final_block_in_request) {
struct page *page;
size_t from, to;
- page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio, &from, &to);
+
+ page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio);
if (IS_ERR(page)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(page);
goto out;
}
+ from = sdio->head ? 0 : sdio->from;
+ to = (sdio->head == sdio->tail - 1) ? sdio->to : PAGE_SIZE;
+ sdio->head++;
while (from < to) {
unsigned this_chunk_bytes; /* # of bytes mapped */
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 5:43 [PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Fix compilation warning for uninitialized variables pramod.gurav.etc
2014-07-04 5:43 ` pramod.gurav.etc
2014-07-13 11:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-14 7:04 ` pramod gurav
2014-07-16 17:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-16 17:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-16 17:56 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-16 17:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 18:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:37 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2014-07-17 9:40 ` direct-io: squelch maybe-uninitialized warning in do_direct_IO() Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 9:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:48 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 11:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:29 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v3] direct-io: fix uninitialized " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-20 9:09 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-21 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-22 9:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C79949.7010201@gmail.com \
--to=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.