Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] machine: replace underscores in machine's property names

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 17.07.2014 19:00, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 17/07/2014 18:47, Michael Roth ha scritto:
>>> > My argument for getting this into 2.1 had been to avoid tools
>>> picking up
>>> > these to-be-renamed property names from the start. At this point, I'm
>>> > not so sure whether it's worse to break management tools or
>>> potentially
>>> > some rarely used/tested option - if we decide for 2.2, is
>>> backporting to
>>> > 2.1.1 an option if we document it in the release notes?
>> IMO, if there's some risk to breaking management or other tools, I'd
>> rather it be left to major releases. And if these values are already
>> misnamed
>> for 2.1.0 and prior, I don't think we stop it from poliferating much
>> more by
>> pushing the fix up by a few months.
> 
> I'm not sure in which case management could break (except for qom-get).
>  Andreas, can you explain?

I was mainly concerned about qom-set, but same goes for qom-get. The
breakage would be in 2.2, if in 2.1 we introduce properties with foo_bar
and rename them to foo-bar in 2.2. Since they're not in 2.0, I had asked
Marcel to rename them for 2.1 on a KVM call.

I checked that sPAPR is not affected, so the only issue is the trivial
g_free(). Since apart from sPAPR we have a compact snippet of properties
being added, grep'ing for occurrences of the old strings and verifying
that the patch changes all properties should be safe for -rc3 if Peter
would be willing to take a pull.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg