* [RESPIN PATCH v6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine
@ 2014-07-14 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pankaj Dubey @ 2014-07-14 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Cc: kgene.kim, linux, t.figa, vikas.sajjan, joshi, naushad, thomas.ab,
chow.kim, Pankaj Dubey
As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
more cleaner.
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
---
This patch is part of exynos-cleanup series v6 [1]. Just respinning after
resolving merge conflicts on latest kgene/for-next.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/10/338
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 18 ++++--------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 2a43a17..99dc5aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
.id = -1,
};
-void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
-{
- if (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos5250())
- platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
-}
-
-void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
-{
- platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
-}
-
void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
@@ -335,10 +324,11 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
exynos_sysram_init();
- if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))
- exynos_cpuidle_init();
+ if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") ||
+ of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250"))
+ platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
- exynos_cpufreq_init();
+ platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [RESPIN PATCH v6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine
@ 2014-07-14 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pankaj Dubey @ 2014-07-14 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
more cleaner.
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
---
This patch is part of exynos-cleanup series v6 [1]. Just respinning after
resolving merge conflicts on latest kgene/for-next.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/10/338
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 18 ++++--------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 2a43a17..99dc5aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
.id = -1,
};
-void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
-{
- if (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos5250())
- platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
-}
-
-void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
-{
- platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
-}
-
void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
@@ -335,10 +324,11 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
exynos_sysram_init();
- if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))
- exynos_cpuidle_init();
+ if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") ||
+ of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250"))
+ platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
- exynos_cpufreq_init();
+ platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [RESPIN PATCH v6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine
2014-07-14 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
@ 2014-07-18 18:52 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pankaj Dubey
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kgene.kim,
linux, t.figa, vikas.sajjan, joshi, naushad, thomas.ab, chow.kim
On 07/14/14 12:58, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
> of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
> exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
> function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
> more cleaner.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey<pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is part of exynos-cleanup series v6 [1]. Just respinning after
> resolving merge conflicts on latest kgene/for-next.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/10/338
>
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 2a43a17..99dc5aa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
> .id = -1,
> };
>
> -void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
> -{
> - if (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos5250())
> - platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
> -}
> -
> -void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
> -{
> - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> -}
> -
> void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
> void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
>
> @@ -335,10 +324,11 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> exynos_sysram_init();
>
> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))
> - exynos_cpuidle_init();
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250"))
> + platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
>
> - exynos_cpufreq_init();
> + platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>
> of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> }
I've applied.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [RESPIN PATCH v6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine
@ 2014-07-18 18:52 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 07/14/14 12:58, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
> of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
> exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
> function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
> more cleaner.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey<pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is part of exynos-cleanup series v6 [1]. Just respinning after
> resolving merge conflicts on latest kgene/for-next.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/10/338
>
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 2a43a17..99dc5aa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
> .id = -1,
> };
>
> -void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
> -{
> - if (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos5250())
> - platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
> -}
> -
> -void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
> -{
> - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> -}
> -
> void __iomem *sysram_base_addr;
> void __iomem *sysram_ns_base_addr;
>
> @@ -335,10 +324,11 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> exynos_sysram_init();
>
> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))
> - exynos_cpuidle_init();
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250"))
> + platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
>
> - exynos_cpufreq_init();
> + platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>
> of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> }
I've applied.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-18 18:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-14 3:58 [RESPIN PATCH v6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-14 3:58 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-18 18:52 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-18 18:52 ` Kukjin Kim
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.