All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:56:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96DC7.10203@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <127793649.dTvqVjg5LM@diego>

On 07/18/2014 12:47 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
>>> based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
>>>
>>> Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
>>> currently supported are the timers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> --
>>
>> I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
>> I am not handling.
>>
>> Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?
>
> wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let
> patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?
>
> There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come
> together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.
>
>
> Also in [0] Olof wrote:
>
> ----------
> Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
> long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
> different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
> mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
> -----------
>
> So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html

Indeed.

Olof, Arnd ? Will you take the patches 5-6-7 ?



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko.stuebner@bq.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	tglx@linutronix.de, grant.likely@linaro.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, florian.vaussard@epfl.ch,
	jic23@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch,
	silvio.fricke@gmail.com, olof@lixom.net,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	robherring2@gmail.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com,
	shawn.guo@freescale.com, anders.berg@lsi.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	hpa@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	fabf@skynet.be, rostedt@goodmis.orgd
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:56:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96DC7.10203@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <127793649.dTvqVjg5LM@diego>

On 07/18/2014 12:47 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
>>> based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
>>>
>>> Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
>>> currently supported are the timers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> --
>>
>> I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
>> I am not handling.
>>
>> Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?
>
> wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let
> patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?
>
> There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come
> together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.
>
>
> Also in [0] Olof wrote:
>
> ----------
> Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
> long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
> different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
> mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
> -----------
>
> So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html

Indeed.

Olof, Arnd ? Will you take the patches 5-6-7 ?



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko.stuebner@bq.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	tglx@linutronix.de, grant.likely@linaro.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, florian.vaussard@epfl.ch,
	jic23@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch,
	silvio.fricke@gmail.com, olof@lixom.net,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	robherring2@gmail.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com,
	shawn.guo@freescale.com, anders.berg@lsi.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	hpa@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	fabf@skynet.be, rostedt@goodmis.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:56:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96DC7.10203@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <127793649.dTvqVjg5LM@diego>

On 07/18/2014 12:47 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
>>> based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
>>>
>>> Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
>>> currently supported are the timers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> --
>>
>> I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
>> I am not handling.
>>
>> Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?
>
> wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let
> patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?
>
> There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come
> together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.
>
>
> Also in [0] Olof wrote:
>
> ----------
> Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
> long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
> different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
> mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
> -----------
>
> So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html

Indeed.

Olof, Arnd ? Will you take the patches 5-6-7 ?



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-18 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-07 15:13 [PATCH v10 0/7] arm: Add basic support for Mediatek Cortex-A7 SoCs Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] of: Provide function to request and map memory Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-16 14:26   ` Rob Herring
2014-07-16 14:26     ` Rob Herring
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] clocksource: Add support for the Mediatek SoCs Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] dt-bindings: add mtk-timer bindings Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] vendor-prefixes: add prefix for Mediatek Inc Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-18  9:46   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-18  9:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-18  9:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-18 10:47     ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-18 10:47       ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-18 10:47       ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-18 18:56       ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-07-18 18:56         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-18 18:56         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-21 13:14         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-21 13:14           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-21 13:14           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] dt-bindings: add documentation for Mediatek SoC Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] arm: mediatek: add dts for Aquaris5 mobile phone Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2014-07-07 15:13   ` Matthias Brugger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C96DC7.10203@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.