From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: add keystone irq controller ip driver
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:20:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CD21C1.9010402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C92643.9050406@ti.com>
Hi Jason,
On 07/18/2014 04:50 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 08:59 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> Grygorii,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 06:27:57PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> On Keystone SOCs, DSP cores can send interrupts to ARM
>>> host using the IRQ controller IP. It provides 28 IRQ
>>> signals to ARM. The IRQ handler running on HOST OS can
>>> identify DSP signal source by analyzing SRCCx bits in
>>> IPCARx registers. This is one of the component used by
>>> the IPC mechanism used on Keystone SOCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../interrupt-controller/ti,keystone-irq.txt | 36 +++
>>> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +
>>> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-keystone.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,keystone-irq.txt
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-keystone.c
>>>
>
>
> [..]
>
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id keystone_irq_dt_ids[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "ti,keystone-irq", },
>>> + {},
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, keystone_irq_dt_ids);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver keystone_irq_device_driver = {
>>> + .probe = keystone_irq_probe,
>>> + .remove = keystone_irq_remove,
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = "keystone_irq",
>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(keystone_irq_dt_ids),
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +module_platform_driver(keystone_irq_device_driver);
>>
>> My understanding of DSP use-cases is a little sparse, are there
>> legitimate scenarios where you might remove this driver during runtime?
>> Perhaps IRQCHIP_DECLARE() might be better?
IRQCHIP_DECLARE() isn't used here, because of two points:
- all consumers of this driver are initialized at module/driver_initcall time
so, we don't need it to be initialized so early
- Keystone 2 supports DT-only boot and IRQ resolution APIs support probe
deferring mechanism now, so we can solve properly any initialization dependencies
if needed.
>>
> There is no scenario where driver needs to hotpluged out. Usecase is
> simple. Its really any other IRQCHIP. The difference is really the
> source of interrupts. Instead of peripherals interrupting the host
> OS9linux), here the DSP cores can send interrupts to Host OS.
>
> Hope this clarifies.
Thanks for your review - I'll update and re-send.
Regards,
- grygorii
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, <ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>,
<m-karicheri2@ti.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: add keystone irq controller ip driver
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:20:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CD21C1.9010402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C92643.9050406@ti.com>
Hi Jason,
On 07/18/2014 04:50 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 08:59 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> Grygorii,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 06:27:57PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> On Keystone SOCs, DSP cores can send interrupts to ARM
>>> host using the IRQ controller IP. It provides 28 IRQ
>>> signals to ARM. The IRQ handler running on HOST OS can
>>> identify DSP signal source by analyzing SRCCx bits in
>>> IPCARx registers. This is one of the component used by
>>> the IPC mechanism used on Keystone SOCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../interrupt-controller/ti,keystone-irq.txt | 36 +++
>>> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +
>>> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-keystone.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,keystone-irq.txt
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-keystone.c
>>>
>
>
> [..]
>
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id keystone_irq_dt_ids[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "ti,keystone-irq", },
>>> + {},
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, keystone_irq_dt_ids);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver keystone_irq_device_driver = {
>>> + .probe = keystone_irq_probe,
>>> + .remove = keystone_irq_remove,
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = "keystone_irq",
>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(keystone_irq_dt_ids),
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +module_platform_driver(keystone_irq_device_driver);
>>
>> My understanding of DSP use-cases is a little sparse, are there
>> legitimate scenarios where you might remove this driver during runtime?
>> Perhaps IRQCHIP_DECLARE() might be better?
IRQCHIP_DECLARE() isn't used here, because of two points:
- all consumers of this driver are initialized at module/driver_initcall time
so, we don't need it to be initialized so early
- Keystone 2 supports DT-only boot and IRQ resolution APIs support probe
deferring mechanism now, so we can solve properly any initialization dependencies
if needed.
>>
> There is no scenario where driver needs to hotpluged out. Usecase is
> simple. Its really any other IRQCHIP. The difference is really the
> source of interrupts. Instead of peripherals interrupting the host
> OS9linux), here the DSP cores can send interrupts to Host OS.
>
> Hope this clarifies.
Thanks for your review - I'll update and re-send.
Regards,
- grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-14 15:27 [PATCH] irqchip: add keystone irq controller ip driver Grygorii Strashko
2014-07-14 15:27 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <1405351677-12108-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-18 12:59 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-18 12:59 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-18 13:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-07-18 13:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-07-21 14:20 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2014-07-21 14:20 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CD21C1.9010402@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.