From: "Joël Krähemann" <weedlight@gmail.com>
To: alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: If underloading is possible what about overloading?
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D8BF74.5060204@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all, short question: If underloading is possible what about
overloading? Is nanosleep overclocking safe?
regards Joël
reply other threads:[~2014-07-30 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D8BF74.5060204@gmail.com \
--to=weedlight@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.