All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	acme@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] perf, x86: large PEBS interrupt threshold
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:36:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D9F1FA.6080106@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140731072744.GN19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 07/31/2014 03:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> 
> OK, so no feedback on the 'pending' discussions we had wrt PEBS record
> generation?
> 
> No feedback on the correctness aspects of the overflow crap?
> 
> Just a new series, which I then have to dig through to figure out wtf
> changed?
> 
> A quick look at patch 6 reads like you still don't understand the issue
> right. There are no 'collisions' as such in PEBS record generation, or
> are there? See the earlier open discussion.

I'm sure collision only create one PEBS records. Actually, the patch description
was written by Andi.



> 
> _WHY_ are you sending me new patches without sorting the open points
> first?
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-31  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-31  6:44 [PATCH v4 0/9] perf, x86: large PEBS interrupt threshold Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] perf, x86: use the PEBS auto reload mechanism when possible Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] perf, x86: introduce setup_pebs_sample_data() Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] perf, x86: large PEBS interrupt threshold Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] perf, x86: drain PEBS buffer during context switch Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:45 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] perf, x86: enlarge PEBS buffer Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  6:45 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] tools, perf: Allow the user to disable time stamps Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31 14:45   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-08-13  5:13   ` [tip:perf/core] perf record: Honour --no-time command line option tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2014-07-31  7:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] perf, x86: large PEBS interrupt threshold Ingo Molnar
2014-07-31  7:18   ` Yan, Zheng
2014-07-31  7:25     ` Ingo Molnar
2014-07-31  7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31  7:36   ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2014-07-31  7:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 14:50   ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D9F1FA.6080106@intel.com \
    --to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.