From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:11:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DA165E.8040601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140730194503.GQ6754@linux.intel.com>
On 07/30/2014 10:45 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
<>
>> + if (sector & (PAGE_SECTORS-1))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Mmm. PAGE_SECTORS is private to brd (and also private to bcache!) at
> this point. We've got a real mess of defines of SECTOR_SIZE, SECTORSIZE,
> SECTOR_SHIFT and so on, dotted throughout various random include files.
> I am not the river to flush those Augean stables today.
>
> I'll go with this, from the dcssblk driver:
>
> if (sector % (PAGE_SIZE / 512))
> return -EINVAL;
>
Sigh, right, sure I did not mean to make that fight. Works as well
<>
>> Style: Need a space between declaration and code (have you check-patch)
>
> That's a bullshit check. I don't know why it's in checkpatch.
>
I did not invent the rules. But I do respect them. I think the merit
of sticking to some common style is much higher then any particular
style choice. Though this particular one I do like, because of the
C rule that forces all declarations before code, so it makes it easier
on the maintenance. In any way Maintainers are suppose to run checkpatch
before submission, some do ;-)
<>
>>> + if (size < 0)
>>
>> if(size < PAGE_SIZE), No?
>
> No, absolutely not. PAGE_SIZE is unsigned long, which (if I understand
> my C integer promotions correctly) means that 'size' gets promoted to
> an unsigned long, and we compare them unsigned, so errors will never be
> caught by this check.
Good point I agree that you need a cast ie.
if(size < (long)PAGE_SIZE)
The reason I'm saying this is because of a bug I actually hit when
playing with partitioning and fdisk, it came out that the last partition's
size was not page aligned, and code that checked for (< 0) crashed because
prd returned the last two sectors of the partition, since your API is sector
based this can happen for you here, before you are memseting a PAGE_SIZE
you need to test there is space, No?
>
>
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:11:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DA165E.8040601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140730194503.GQ6754@linux.intel.com>
On 07/30/2014 10:45 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
<>
>> + if (sector & (PAGE_SECTORS-1))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Mmm. PAGE_SECTORS is private to brd (and also private to bcache!) at
> this point. We've got a real mess of defines of SECTOR_SIZE, SECTORSIZE,
> SECTOR_SHIFT and so on, dotted throughout various random include files.
> I am not the river to flush those Augean stables today.
>
> I'll go with this, from the dcssblk driver:
>
> if (sector % (PAGE_SIZE / 512))
> return -EINVAL;
>
Sigh, right, sure I did not mean to make that fight. Works as well
<>
>> Style: Need a space between declaration and code (have you check-patch)
>
> That's a bullshit check. I don't know why it's in checkpatch.
>
I did not invent the rules. But I do respect them. I think the merit
of sticking to some common style is much higher then any particular
style choice. Though this particular one I do like, because of the
C rule that forces all declarations before code, so it makes it easier
on the maintenance. In any way Maintainers are suppose to run checkpatch
before submission, some do ;-)
<>
>>> + if (size < 0)
>>
>> if(size < PAGE_SIZE), No?
>
> No, absolutely not. PAGE_SIZE is unsigned long, which (if I understand
> my C integer promotions correctly) means that 'size' gets promoted to
> an unsigned long, and we compare them unsigned, so errors will never be
> caught by this check.
Good point I agree that you need a cast ie.
if(size < (long)PAGE_SIZE)
The reason I'm saying this is because of a bug I actually hit when
playing with partitioning and fdisk, it came out that the last partition's
size was not page aligned, and code that checked for (< 0) crashed because
prd returned the last two sectors of the partition, since your API is sector
based this can happen for you here, before you are memseting a PAGE_SIZE
you need to test there is space, No?
>
>
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 19:47 [PATCH v8 00/22] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/22] Fix XIP fault vs truncate race Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 11:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 11:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/22] Allow page fault handlers to perform the COW Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 11:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 11:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/22] axonram: Fix bug in direct_access Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 11:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 11:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-30 16:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-30 16:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-30 16:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-30 16:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-30 20:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-30 20:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 10:16 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 10:16 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-30 19:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-30 19:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 10:11 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2014-07-31 10:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 14:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 14:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 15:28 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 15:28 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-31 18:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 18:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-31 20:30 ` Zwisler, Ross
2014-07-31 20:30 ` Zwisler, Ross
2014-08-01 18:45 ` Zwisler, Ross
2014-08-01 18:45 ` Zwisler, Ross
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/22] Add vm_replace_mixed() Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 9:10 ` Jan Kara
2014-07-23 9:10 ` Jan Kara
2014-07-23 11:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 11:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 13:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 14:20 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 14:20 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 14:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 14:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 15:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 15:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-24 1:36 ` Zhang, Tianfei
2014-07-24 1:36 ` Zhang, Tianfei
2014-07-25 19:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-25 19:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-28 13:25 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-28 13:25 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-29 1:55 ` Zhang, Tianfei
2014-07-29 1:55 ` Zhang, Tianfei
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/22] Introduce IS_DAX(inode) Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/22] Add copy_to_iter(), copy_from_iter() and iov_iter_zero() Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/22] Replace XIP read and write with DAX I/O Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/22] Replace ext2_clear_xip_target with dax_clear_blocks Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/22] Replace the XIP page fault handler with the DAX page fault handler Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 12:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 12:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 13:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 13:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 14:10 ` [PATCH v8 00/22] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs Howard Chu
2014-07-23 14:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 15:28 ` Howard Chu
2014-07-23 20:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-23 16:57 ` [PATCH v8 10/22] Replace the XIP page fault handler with the DAX page fault handler Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-23 16:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-23 19:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 19:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/22] Replace xip_truncate_page with dax_truncate_page Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 12/22] Replace XIP documentation with DAX documentation Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 13/22] Remove get_xip_mem Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 14/22] ext2: Remove ext2_xip_verify_sb() Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 15/22] ext2: Remove ext2_use_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 16/22] ext2: Remove xip.c and xip.h Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 17/22] Remove CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP and rename CONFIG_FS_XIP to CONFIG_FS_DAX Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 18/22] ext2: Remove ext2_aops_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 19/22] Get rid of most mentions of XIP in ext2 Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 20/22] xip: Add xip_zero_page_range Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 21/22] ext4: Add DAX functionality Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` [PATCH v8 22/22] brd: Rename XIP to DAX Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-22 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 12:30 ` [PATCH v8 00/22] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 12:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-23 13:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 13:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 15:58 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-23 15:58 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-23 19:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-23 19:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-07-24 18:51 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-07-24 18:51 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DA165E.8040601@gmail.com \
--to=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.