From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, JBeulich@suse.com,
Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Consolidate boolean inputs in hvm and p2m into a shared bitmap.
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:13:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8F9A3.7030506@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407768526-29112-1-git-send-email-tamas.lengyel@zentific.com>
On 08/11/2014 10:48 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
index 76616ac..1f72e19 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_svm(void)
}
static void svm_do_nested_pgfault(struct vcpu *v,
- struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t npfec, paddr_t gpa)
+ struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t pfec, paddr_t gpa)
I am not sure I understand the reason behind this change. This *is*
still a nested page fault error code, isn't it?
Was this to avoid name collision with npfec variable that is added below?
-boris
> {
> int ret;
> unsigned long gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -1403,10 +1403,13 @@ static void svm_do_nested_pgfault(struct vcpu *v,
> p2m_access_t p2ma;
> struct p2m_domain *p2m = NULL;
>
> - ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, 0, ~0ul,
> - 1, /* All NPFs count as reads */
> - npfec & PFEC_write_access,
> - npfec & PFEC_insn_fetch);
> + struct npfec npfec = {
> + .read_access = 1, /* All NPFs count as reads */
> + .write_access = !!(pfec & PFEC_write_access),
> + .insn_fetch = !!(pfec & PFEC_insn_fetch)
> + };
> +
> + ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, ~0ul, npfec);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 14:48 [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Consolidate boolean inputs in hvm and p2m into a shared bitmap Tamas K Lengyel
2014-08-11 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] x86/hvm: Treat non-instruction fetch nested page faults also as read violations Tamas K Lengyel
2014-08-11 16:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-14 0:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-14 8:02 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-14 16:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-14 16:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-14 17:32 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-14 20:39 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-14 22:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-14 22:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-14 23:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-14 23:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-14 23:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-14 23:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-14 23:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-15 14:57 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 20:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-15 21:23 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 21:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-15 14:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-15 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 15:09 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-15 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 15:50 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-15 16:33 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-15 16:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-18 19:37 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-08-18 20:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] x86/mem_event: Deliver gla fault EPT violation information Tamas K Lengyel
2014-08-11 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 11:18 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-12 12:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 17:27 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 18:35 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-11 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] tools/xen-access: Print gla valid/fault information Tamas K Lengyel
2014-08-12 15:31 ` Ian Jackson
2014-08-12 21:54 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-11 16:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Consolidate boolean inputs in hvm and p2m into a shared bitmap Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 17:13 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-08-11 17:23 ` Tamas Lengyel
2014-08-14 0:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-08-28 12:36 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E8F9A3.7030506@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tamas.lengyel@zentific.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.