All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/kvm: support to handle sw breakpoint
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:47:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9FBF6.5010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E9F824.9080906@suse.de>

On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> index da86d9b..d95014e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>> This should be book3s_emulate.c.
>>>> Any reason we can't make that 00dddd00 opcode as breakpoint common to
>>>> all powerpc variants ?
>>> I can't think of a good reason. We use a hypercall on booke (which traps
>>> into an illegal instruction for pr) today, but I don't think it has to
>>> be that way.
>>>
>>> Given that the user space API allows us to change it dynamically, there
>>> should be nothing blocking us from going with 00dddd00 always.
>>>
>> Kindly correct me if i am wrong. So we can still have a common code in
>> emulate.c to set the env for both HV and pr incase of illegal
>> instruction (i will rebase latest src). But suggestion here to use
>> 00dddd00, in that case current path in embed is kvmppc_handle_exit
>> (booke.c) -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV -> emulation_exit ->
>> kvmppc_emulate_instruction, will change to kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
>> -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM -> if debug instr call emulation_exit else
>> send to guest?
> 
> I can't follow your description above.
> 
My bad.

> With the latest git version HV KVM does not include emulate.c anymore.
> 
> Also, it would make a lot of sense of have the same soft breakpoint
> instruction across all ppc targets, so it would make sense to change it
> to 0x00dddd00 for booke as well.
> 
Got it. Was describing the current control flow with respect to booke
and where changes needed (for same software breakpoint inst). This is
for my understanding and wanted verify.

kvmppc_handle_exit(booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV
		-> emulation_exit
			->kvmppc_emulate_instruction

Incase of using the same software breakpoint instruction (0x00dddd00),
then we need to add code in booke something like this

kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM
		->	if debug instr
				->emulation_exit
			else
				->send to guest?
				
> Basically you would have handling code in emulate.c and book3s_hv.c at
> the end of the day.
> 
Yes. Will resend the patch with updated code.

> 
> Alex
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/kvm: support to handle sw breakpoint
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:05:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9FBF6.5010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E9F824.9080906@suse.de>

On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> index da86d9b..d95014e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>> This should be book3s_emulate.c.
>>>> Any reason we can't make that 00dddd00 opcode as breakpoint common to
>>>> all powerpc variants ?
>>> I can't think of a good reason. We use a hypercall on booke (which traps
>>> into an illegal instruction for pr) today, but I don't think it has to
>>> be that way.
>>>
>>> Given that the user space API allows us to change it dynamically, there
>>> should be nothing blocking us from going with 00dddd00 always.
>>>
>> Kindly correct me if i am wrong. So we can still have a common code in
>> emulate.c to set the env for both HV and pr incase of illegal
>> instruction (i will rebase latest src). But suggestion here to use
>> 00dddd00, in that case current path in embed is kvmppc_handle_exit
>> (booke.c) -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV -> emulation_exit ->
>> kvmppc_emulate_instruction, will change to kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
>> -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM -> if debug instr call emulation_exit else
>> send to guest?
> 
> I can't follow your description above.
> 
My bad.

> With the latest git version HV KVM does not include emulate.c anymore.
> 
> Also, it would make a lot of sense of have the same soft breakpoint
> instruction across all ppc targets, so it would make sense to change it
> to 0x00dddd00 for booke as well.
> 
Got it. Was describing the current control flow with respect to booke
and where changes needed (for same software breakpoint inst). This is
for my understanding and wanted verify.

kvmppc_handle_exit(booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV
		-> emulation_exit
			->kvmppc_emulate_instruction

Incase of using the same software breakpoint instruction (0x00dddd00),
then we need to add code in booke something like this

kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM
		->	if debug instr
				->emulation_exit
			else
				->send to guest?
				
> Basically you would have handling code in emulate.c and book3s_hv.c at
> the end of the day.
> 
Yes. Will resend the patch with updated code.

> 
> Alex
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/kvm: support to handle sw breakpoint
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:05:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9FBF6.5010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E9F824.9080906@suse.de>

On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> index da86d9b..d95014e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>>>> This should be book3s_emulate.c.
>>>> Any reason we can't make that 00dddd00 opcode as breakpoint common to
>>>> all powerpc variants ?
>>> I can't think of a good reason. We use a hypercall on booke (which traps
>>> into an illegal instruction for pr) today, but I don't think it has to
>>> be that way.
>>>
>>> Given that the user space API allows us to change it dynamically, there
>>> should be nothing blocking us from going with 00dddd00 always.
>>>
>> Kindly correct me if i am wrong. So we can still have a common code in
>> emulate.c to set the env for both HV and pr incase of illegal
>> instruction (i will rebase latest src). But suggestion here to use
>> 00dddd00, in that case current path in embed is kvmppc_handle_exit
>> (booke.c) -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV -> emulation_exit ->
>> kvmppc_emulate_instruction, will change to kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
>> -> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM -> if debug instr call emulation_exit else
>> send to guest?
> 
> I can't follow your description above.
> 
My bad.

> With the latest git version HV KVM does not include emulate.c anymore.
> 
> Also, it would make a lot of sense of have the same soft breakpoint
> instruction across all ppc targets, so it would make sense to change it
> to 0x00dddd00 for booke as well.
> 
Got it. Was describing the current control flow with respect to booke
and where changes needed (for same software breakpoint inst). This is
for my understanding and wanted verify.

kvmppc_handle_exit(booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV
		-> emulation_exit
			->kvmppc_emulate_instruction

Incase of using the same software breakpoint instruction (0x00dddd00),
then we need to add code in booke something like this

kvmppc_handle_exit (booke.c)
	-> BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM
		->	if debug instr
				->emulation_exit
			else
				->send to guest?
				
> Basically you would have handling code in emulate.c and book3s_hv.c at
> the end of the day.
> 
Yes. Will resend the patch with updated code.

> 
> Alex
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-01  4:50 [PATCH v3] powerpc/kvm: support to handle sw breakpoint Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-01  4:50 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-01  4:50 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-03 15:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-08-03 15:51   ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-08-03 15:51   ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-08-11  3:59   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-11  4:11     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-11  3:59     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-11  7:26 ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-11  7:26   ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-11  7:26   ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-11  8:51   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-08-11  8:51     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-08-11  8:51     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-08-11  9:15     ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-11  9:15       ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-11  9:15       ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12  5:17       ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12  5:29         ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12  5:17         ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12 11:19         ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 11:19           ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 11:19           ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 11:35           ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2014-08-12 11:47             ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12 11:35             ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12 12:15             ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 12:15               ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 12:15               ` Alexander Graf
2014-08-12 12:21               ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12 12:33                 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-08-12 12:21                 ` Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E9FBF6.5010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.