All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: frowand.list@gmail.com
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH to be tested] serial: msm_serial: add missing sysrq handling
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:42:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EC220D.5050908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EC1FEA.5070907@gmail.com>

On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:

< snip >
 
> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
> that my patch modified.  So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
> not previously applied.  Hopefully I did not make any mistakes there.  I will
> reply to this email with each of your redone patches.

Stephen's patch alternative number 2:

---
 drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
@@ -125,25 +125,40 @@ static void handle_rx_dm(struct uart_por
 	port->icount.rx += count;
 
 	while (count > 0) {
-		unsigned int c;
+		unsigned char buf[4];
+		int sysrq, r_count, i;
 
 		sr = msm_read(port, UART_SR);
 		if ((sr & UART_SR_RX_READY) == 0) {
 			msm_port->old_snap_state -= count;
 			break;
 		}
-		c = msm_read(port, UARTDM_RF);
-		if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
-			port->icount.brk++;
-			if (uart_handle_break(port))
-				continue;
-		} else if (sr & UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR)
-			port->icount.frame++;
-
-		/* TODO: handle sysrq */
-		tty_insert_flip_string(tport, (char *)&c,
-				       (count > 4) ? 4 : count);
-		count -= 4;
+		readsl(port->membase + UARTDM_RF, buf, 1);
+
+		r_count = min_t(int, count, sizeof(buf));
+
+		for (i = 0; i < r_count; i++) {
+			char flag = TTY_NORMAL;
+
+			if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
+				if (buf[i] == 0) {
+					port->icount.brk++;
+					flag = TTY_BREAK;
+					if (uart_handle_break(port))
+						continue;
+				}
+			}
+
+			if (!(port->read_status_mask & UART_SR_RX_BREAK))
+				flag = TTY_NORMAL;
+
+			spin_unlock(&port->lock);
+			sysrq = uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, buf[i]);
+			spin_lock(&port->lock);
+			if (!sysrq)
+				tty_insert_flip_char(tport, buf[i], flag);
+		}
+		count -= r_count;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&port->lock);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH to be tested] serial: msm_serial: add missing sysrq handling
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:42:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EC220D.5050908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EC1FEA.5070907@gmail.com>

On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote:

< snip >
 
> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code
> that my patch modified.  So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was
> not previously applied.  Hopefully I did not make any mistakes there.  I will
> reply to this email with each of your redone patches.

Stephen's patch alternative number 2:

---
 drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
@@ -125,25 +125,40 @@ static void handle_rx_dm(struct uart_por
 	port->icount.rx += count;
 
 	while (count > 0) {
-		unsigned int c;
+		unsigned char buf[4];
+		int sysrq, r_count, i;
 
 		sr = msm_read(port, UART_SR);
 		if ((sr & UART_SR_RX_READY) == 0) {
 			msm_port->old_snap_state -= count;
 			break;
 		}
-		c = msm_read(port, UARTDM_RF);
-		if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
-			port->icount.brk++;
-			if (uart_handle_break(port))
-				continue;
-		} else if (sr & UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR)
-			port->icount.frame++;
-
-		/* TODO: handle sysrq */
-		tty_insert_flip_string(tport, (char *)&c,
-				       (count > 4) ? 4 : count);
-		count -= 4;
+		readsl(port->membase + UARTDM_RF, buf, 1);
+
+		r_count = min_t(int, count, sizeof(buf));
+
+		for (i = 0; i < r_count; i++) {
+			char flag = TTY_NORMAL;
+
+			if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
+				if (buf[i] == 0) {
+					port->icount.brk++;
+					flag = TTY_BREAK;
+					if (uart_handle_break(port))
+						continue;
+				}
+			}
+
+			if (!(port->read_status_mask & UART_SR_RX_BREAK))
+				flag = TTY_NORMAL;
+
+			spin_unlock(&port->lock);
+			sysrq = uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, buf[i]);
+			spin_lock(&port->lock);
+			if (!sysrq)
+				tty_insert_flip_char(tport, buf[i], flag);
+		}
+		count -= r_count;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&port->lock);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-14  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-07  0:16 [PATCH to be tested] serial: msm_serial: add missing sysrq handling Frank Rowand
2014-08-07  0:16 ` Frank Rowand
2014-08-13  0:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-08-13  0:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-08-14  2:33   ` Frank Rowand
2014-08-14  2:33     ` Frank Rowand
2014-08-14  2:42     ` Frank Rowand
2014-08-14  2:42       ` Frank Rowand
2014-08-14  2:42     ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2014-08-14  2:42       ` Frank Rowand
2014-10-03 21:34       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-03 21:34         ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-03 22:18         ` Frank Rowand
2014-10-03 22:18           ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53EC220D.5050908@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.