From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem-hotplug: let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range()
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:36:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EF6C79.3000603@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140816130456.GH9305@htj.dyndns.org>
On 2014/8/16 21:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:31:22PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> Let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range(),
>> it is used to to prevent memblock from allocating hotpluggable memory
>> for the kernel at early time. The code is the same as __next_mem_range_rev().
>>
>> Clear hotpluggable flag before releasing free pages to the buddy allocator.
>
> Please try to explain "why" in addition to "what". Why do we need to
> clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early() in addition to
> numa_clear_node_hotplug() in x86 numa.c? Does this make x86 code
> redundant? If not, why?
>
Hi Tejun,
numa_clear_node_hotplug()? There is only numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug().
If we don't clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early(), the
memory which marked hotpluggable flag will not free to buddy allocator.
Because __next_mem_range() will skip them.
free_low_memory_core_early
for_each_free_mem_range
for_each_mem_range
__next_mem_range
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Wen Congyang" <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem-hotplug: let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range()
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:36:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EF6C79.3000603@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140816130456.GH9305@htj.dyndns.org>
On 2014/8/16 21:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:31:22PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> Let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range(),
>> it is used to to prevent memblock from allocating hotpluggable memory
>> for the kernel at early time. The code is the same as __next_mem_range_rev().
>>
>> Clear hotpluggable flag before releasing free pages to the buddy allocator.
>
> Please try to explain "why" in addition to "what". Why do we need to
> clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early() in addition to
> numa_clear_node_hotplug() in x86 numa.c? Does this make x86 code
> redundant? If not, why?
>
Hi Tejun,
numa_clear_node_hotplug()? There is only numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug().
If we don't clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early(), the
memory which marked hotpluggable flag will not free to buddy allocator.
Because __next_mem_range() will skip them.
free_low_memory_core_early
for_each_free_mem_range
for_each_mem_range
__next_mem_range
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-16 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 13:31 [PATCH] mem-hotplug: let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range() Xishi Qiu
2014-08-11 13:31 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-16 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-16 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-16 14:36 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2014-08-16 14:36 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-17 11:08 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-17 11:08 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-18 1:13 ` tangchen
2014-08-18 1:13 ` tangchen
2014-08-18 3:18 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-18 3:18 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-18 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-18 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-18 2:00 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-18 2:00 ` Xishi Qiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EF6C79.3000603@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.