From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Cc: jg1.han@samsung.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
robdclark@gmail.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] video : remove redundant error check
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FC629A.2050101@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516093123.GA17245@devel.8.8.4.4>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1248 bytes --]
On 16/05/14 12:31, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> It doesn't need to check "err" for printing info.
> And also use pr_info instead of printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: removes unneeded lines for sending a patch
>
> drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> index bb674e4..15cb397 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> @@ -1910,13 +1910,12 @@ static void i810fb_find_init_mode(struct fb_info *info)
>
> for (i = 0; i < par->ddc_num + 1; i++) {
> err = i810_probe_i2c_connector(info, &par->edid, i);
> - if (!err)
> + if (!err) {
> + pr_info("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n");
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (!err)
> - printk("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n");
> -
> fb_edid_to_monspecs(par->edid, specs);
>
> if (specs->modedb == NULL)
>
I don't know... I think I personally like more the original version. In
fact, the whole print looks quite useless to me, or at least it should
be a debug print.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>, <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Cc: <jg1.han@samsung.com>, <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
<robdclark@gmail.com>, <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
<Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>, <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] video : remove redundant error check
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:34:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FC629A.2050101@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516093123.GA17245@devel.8.8.4.4>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1248 bytes --]
On 16/05/14 12:31, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> It doesn't need to check "err" for printing info.
> And also use pr_info instead of printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: removes unneeded lines for sending a patch
>
> drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> index bb674e4..15cb397 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c
> @@ -1910,13 +1910,12 @@ static void i810fb_find_init_mode(struct fb_info *info)
>
> for (i = 0; i < par->ddc_num + 1; i++) {
> err = i810_probe_i2c_connector(info, &par->edid, i);
> - if (!err)
> + if (!err) {
> + pr_info("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n");
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (!err)
> - printk("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n");
> -
> fb_edid_to_monspecs(par->edid, specs);
>
> if (specs->modedb == NULL)
>
I don't know... I think I personally like more the original version. In
fact, the whole print looks quite useless to me, or at least it should
be a debug print.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 9:31 [PATCH V2] video : remove redundant error check Daeseok Youn
2014-05-16 9:31 ` Daeseok Youn
2014-08-26 10:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-08-26 10:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-08-27 10:00 ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-08-27 10:00 ` DaeSeok Youn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FC629A.2050101@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.