* Running a teuthology workload depending on the distribution @ 2014-08-31 10:33 Loic Dachary 2014-09-03 21:44 ` Zack Cerza 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2014-08-31 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zack Cerza; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 766 bytes --] Hi Zack, The isa erasure code plugin is only built on some architectures. The workload described at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/erasure-code/ec-rados-plugin%3Disa-k%3D2-m%3D1.yaml can therefore only be run on those architectures. How would you recommend that it is integrated in the upgrade suites ? Adding it to https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload for instance, at the same level as https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload/ec-rados-plugin%3Djerasure-k%3D3-m%3D1.yaml will not work because it will fail when running on precise (for instance). Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Running a teuthology workload depending on the distribution 2014-08-31 10:33 Running a teuthology workload depending on the distribution Loic Dachary @ 2014-09-03 21:44 ` Zack Cerza 2014-09-03 22:59 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Zack Cerza @ 2014-09-03 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development Hi Loic, Sage recently filed these, which seem like they might help with what you're asking. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9256 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9255 I'll be getting to work on them relatively soon, just not quite yet. In the meantime, would it be feasible to, say, make the relevant task in the workload check for the presence of the plugin, and immediately fail if it's not found? That way we can waive those failures, and have them not use many more resources than necessary. Zack On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Zack, > > The isa erasure code plugin is only built on some architectures. The workload described at > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/erasure-code/ec-rados-plugin%3Disa-k%3D2-m%3D1.yaml > > can therefore only be run on those architectures. How would you recommend that it is integrated in the upgrade suites ? Adding it to > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload > > for instance, at the same level as > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload/ec-rados-plugin%3Djerasure-k%3D3-m%3D1.yaml > > will not work because it will fail when running on precise (for instance). > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Running a teuthology workload depending on the distribution 2014-09-03 21:44 ` Zack Cerza @ 2014-09-03 22:59 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2014-09-03 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zack Cerza; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1734 bytes --] Hi Zack, It's great that it's scheduled for this sprint, if I'm reading http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/378 correctly ;-) In the meantime it is not a blocker, I can work around it. Thanks ! On 03/09/2014 23:44, Zack Cerza wrote: > Hi Loic, > > Sage recently filed these, which seem like they might help with what > you're asking. > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9256 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9255 > > I'll be getting to work on them relatively soon, just not quite yet. > In the meantime, would it be feasible to, say, make the relevant task > in the workload check for the presence of the plugin, and immediately > fail if it's not found? That way we can waive those failures, and have > them not use many more resources than necessary. > > Zack > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> Hi Zack, >> >> The isa erasure code plugin is only built on some architectures. The workload described at >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/erasure-code/ec-rados-plugin%3Disa-k%3D2-m%3D1.yaml >> >> can therefore only be run on those architectures. How would you recommend that it is integrated in the upgrade suites ? Adding it to >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload >> >> for instance, at the same level as >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/suites/upgrade/firefly-x/stress-split/9-workload/ec-rados-plugin%3Djerasure-k%3D3-m%3D1.yaml >> >> will not work because it will fail when running on precise (for instance). >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-03 22:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-08-31 10:33 Running a teuthology workload depending on the distribution Loic Dachary 2014-09-03 21:44 ` Zack Cerza 2014-09-03 22:59 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.