All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-rcar: fix MNR interrupt handling
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:29:06 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54060C72.3010309@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1843756.qQiZLxsyqD-gHKXc3Y1Z8zGSmamagVegGFoWSdPRAKMAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>

On 09/02/2014 01:15 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> Sometimes the MNR and MST interrupts happen simultaneously  (stop  automatically
> follows NACK, according to the manuals) and in such case the ID_NACK flag  isn't
> set since the MST interrupt handling precedes MNR and all interrupts are cleared
> and disabled then, so that MNR interrupt is never noticed -- this causes NACK'ed
> transfers to be falsely reported as successful. Exchanging MNR and  MST handlers
> fixes this issue, however the MNR bit  somehow  gets set again even after  being
> explicitly cleared, so I decided to completely suppress handling of all disabled
> interrupts (which is a good thing anyway)...

> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org

> ---
> The patch is against Wolfram Sang's 'linux.git' repo.

>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c |   15 +++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> +++ linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> @@ -367,18 +367,15 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_i2c_irq(int irq,
>
>   	msr = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMSR);
>
> +	/* Only handle interrupts that are currently enabled */
> +	msr &= rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMIER);
> +

    I think it makes sense to check 'msr' for 0 and return IRQ_NONE in this 
case. Would you apply such patch (probably to the -next branch)?

WBR, Sergei

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-rcar: fix MNR interrupt handling
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:29:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54060C72.3010309@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1843756.qQiZLxsyqD-gHKXc3Y1Z8zGSmamagVegGFoWSdPRAKMAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>

On 09/02/2014 01:15 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> Sometimes the MNR and MST interrupts happen simultaneously  (stop  automatically
> follows NACK, according to the manuals) and in such case the ID_NACK flag  isn't
> set since the MST interrupt handling precedes MNR and all interrupts are cleared
> and disabled then, so that MNR interrupt is never noticed -- this causes NACK'ed
> transfers to be falsely reported as successful. Exchanging MNR and  MST handlers
> fixes this issue, however the MNR bit  somehow  gets set again even after  being
> explicitly cleared, so I decided to completely suppress handling of all disabled
> interrupts (which is a good thing anyway)...

> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

> ---
> The patch is against Wolfram Sang's 'linux.git' repo.

>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c |   15 +++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> =================================> --- linux.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> +++ linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> @@ -367,18 +367,15 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_i2c_irq(int irq,
>
>   	msr = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMSR);
>
> +	/* Only handle interrupts that are currently enabled */
> +	msr &= rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICMIER);
> +

    I think it makes sense to check 'msr' for 0 and return IRQ_NONE in this 
case. Would you apply such patch (probably to the -next branch)?

WBR, Sergei


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-02 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-01 21:15 [PATCH] i2c-rcar: fix MNR interrupt handling Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-01 21:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-02 10:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-09-02 10:28   ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found] ` <1843756.qQiZLxsyqD-gHKXc3Y1Z8zGSmamagVegGFoWSdPRAKMAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-02 18:29   ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-09-02 18:29     ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54060C72.3010309@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov-m4dtvfq/zs1mrggop+s0pdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.